![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Relic of Wandering Days
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: You'll See Perpetual Change.
Posts: 1,480
![]() |
I think there is a place for both and would hate to see the printed versions go entirely extinct. I'm way too impatient to wait for Windows to boot up every time I need to look something up!
![]() On a more serious note, I think if I were told I had to give up my hard back copy, I'd put up a good fight. It would be like having something very valuable and being told to give it to someone else for safe keeping. There is always that chance that something might happen and you would never get it back when you want it. Last edited by Hilde Bracegirdle; 08-29-2010 at 06:01 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Illustrious Ulair
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the home of lost causes, and forsaken beliefs, and unpopular names,and impossible loyalties
Posts: 4,240
![]() ![]() |
The real significance for me in this story is that a book which Tolkien himself worked on may be reaching the end of its real life & about to take on a virtual one. Wonder what his thoughts would be?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,039
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Not being much of a fan of 'technology' and 'progress', I doubt he would have approved. I don't think he would have cared for the Digital Age in general.
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Relic of Wandering Days
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: You'll See Perpetual Change.
Posts: 1,480
![]() |
Having translated older works, I can't help but think he would see value in a tangible printed page over the more transient, virtual one.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Mighty Quill
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Walking off to look for America
Posts: 2,230
![]() |
The notion that books will completely disappear is completely ridiculous! They've been around for how long exactly? They are not going to be done away with, especially this quickly. Electronics lose their shine and novelty quickly. Computers and electronic media are great, but it's not going to stop people from buying books and using technology that is as old as writing itself. I agree that it is true that dictionaries are easier to use when you don't have to search through two thousand pages of words you don't want, but there's a sort of satisfaction that goes with looking through a real dictionary and finding the word you want. I, at least, look forward to owning every single volume of the Oxford English Dictionary some day.
__________________
The Party Doesn't Start Until You're Dead.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Relic of Wandering Days
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: You'll See Perpetual Change.
Posts: 1,480
![]() |
Ah, and when browsing through those hundreds of thousands of words you're likely to meet a few new ones! Can't do that nearly as easily on line.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Mighty Quill
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Walking off to look for America
Posts: 2,230
![]() |
Quote:
![]()
__________________
The Party Doesn't Start Until You're Dead.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
|
Unless they plan on making the electronic readers cheaper they're not going to be able to get rid of paper bound books. I currently live in a relatively poor area of the country and while I am fortunate enough to be able to buy books, I know many people who are solely dependent on the public and school libraries for books. There is simply no way that the people in this area would be able to buy a Kindle or iPad. What are the publishers going to do, subsidize electronic readers for everybody.
Dealing with the OED specifically the rate to subscribe for one year is $295USD, the price for the OED Print Version on Amazon is $995USD. Assuming that a person who bought the OED P.V. would take care of it and make it last for longer than four years they would actually come out ahead because the by the end of four years online subscribers would have paid $1180USD. It looks like I've found another soapbox. ![]()
__________________
Busy, Busy, Busy...hoping for more free time soon. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Illustrious Ulair
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the home of lost causes, and forsaken beliefs, and unpopular names,and impossible loyalties
Posts: 4,240
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
I can see the argument that language changes so fast now, that life generally is so fast, that on line access is preferable - & I can't really put the other side of the case because I tend to go on-line for that kind of stuff, but I just like the idea of having the physical books around somewhere. E-books are far more desired by publishers than readers, I think - they cost nothing to produce(no raw materials costs, no manufacturing costs, no transport cost, no storage costs - & can be sold for close on the price of the physical book. And that's after you've paid out a small fortune for your e-reader.... The way things seem to be going is a combination of e-texts & print on demand (cf http://www.tolkien.co.uk/PrintonDema...sdt=1&sort=son ) which will all mean that fairly soon we would start to see an end to the book except as luxury item, or as sellable item - the e-books are mostly restricted to use on one or two devices so can't be sold on or lent. Do we need physical books though? Or if we do, will our kids & grandkids? For myself, I can see how reference books can be replaced by on-line access, but not novels - Lord of the Rings on an ipad just seems wrong, a denial of the essential nature & message of the work itself - which at its heart is the story of a physical book of history & its transmission down the ages. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
|
I can't imagine growing up without books, but if they truly become a luxury item I guess a lot of people will grow up with the privilege of reading books. Which rather scares me, seeing as the literacy rate is bad enough without denying access to people who want to read.
Also the idea of being completely dependent on an electronic device for my books scares me. Electronics don't work half the time. I work in the Middle School Library this year. I also read to some of the kindergartners and first graders on the bus. I can tell you that for some of these kids there is nothing compared to a physical book. So I don't think that today's kids necessarily want book publishers to stop publishing physical books.
__________________
Busy, Busy, Busy...hoping for more free time soon. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Curmudgeonly Wordwraith
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ensconced in curmudgeonly pursuits
Posts: 2,515
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A thought came to me. It's not really epiphanic, but if publishers shift to e-readers completely, doesn't that then make their jobs obsolete in many cases? As an author, what exactly do I need a publisher for, if I can self-publish on the internet? All one really needs is a generic e-reader that will accept a file off the 'net and voila! I no longer have to share the profits of a book with a publisher or, rather, the publisher won't be doling out scant percentages of my profits to me.
Of course, there is the marketing aspect of publishers, and I suppose that will remain an effective tool for many years, but national book chains are already suffering in the U.S. (Barnes & Noble is still healthy, but Borders is hovering near bankruptcy), and if books are eventually going the way of the dodo, what would be the point of going to a book store at all? Naturally, trade books and dictionaries may still require publishers, but it seems that encyclopedias are already becoming irrelevent, what with the ease of finding information on the internet. I have a copy of the OED sitting on an antique lectern, and it looks very smart -- literally -- but I do not go to it as often as I used to. Seeking out words on the internet is far easier. But I do not like e-readers, personally, in regards to simply reading a book. I skip around and backtrack too much -- the cursed thing hurts my eyes. I also still read a newspaper every morning, even though the publishers have the exact same info on the 'net. But I am probably one of the last generation to find solace in a paper and a cup of coffee to start my day. Besides, I don't believe they have found an adequate internet solution for crossword puzzles. As far as Tolkien's view on the matter? I think he would be appalled. But this is a man who deeply distrusted automobiles and other forms of technology, which made him old-fashioned even 50 years ago.
__________________
And your little sister's immaculate virginity wings away on the bony shoulders of a young horse named George who stole surreptitiously into her geography revision. Last edited by Morthoron; 08-30-2010 at 08:41 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |