Game Thread: TIG XCII - Disaster by the Lake - The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum

Aganzir · 12-08-2011, 03:53 PM

Oh and just something minor to cheer you all up: 11 villagers; 4 villains, 7 goodies; 3 wolves, 8 humans. If we don't get a wolf either today or tomorrow, we probably lose.

INNOCENT
Kit. I like her arguments and she's reasonable enough. I still dread her though.
Pitch. I simply don't think he'd play the way he did if he was a wolf or the cobbler. Never mind that "there was probably a wolf involved among the first players", it's a single minor point against him when he's otherwise making sense.

GUILTY
Green. I think her attack on Nog was opportunistic because she knows what kind of player he is. And there's something very wrong with her not suspecting me because usually I annoy her and that makes her suspicious.
Nog. He doesn't strike me as a wolf but I don't think cobbler would be that far-fetched... Which means he's probably the seer. Whoops I forgot we're not supposed to speculate on gifteds! (And before anyone gets carried away, that's a reference to a particular catastrophic game.)
Shasta. Doesn't sit right with me at all. I can't explain it other than that his way of playing reminds me vividly of Shastawolf.
Bom. Has posted little that isn't crazy, therefore he's here for now.
Lottie. Because behaving unusually = evil, when it isn't that simple.
Gal. I kind of like her because she seems nice and tra-la-lally enough, but I don't trust her.
sally. Evil unless proven otherwise, and she isn't proving very apt at proving that because she doesn't post.
Nerwen. Sneaky.

Unless something drastic happens before I go to bed, I intend to vote for one of the three first Guilties.

12-08-2011, 03:53 PM	#11
Aganzir Woman of Secret Shadow Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: in hollow halls beneath the fells Posts: 4,511	Oh and just something minor to cheer you all up: 11 villagers; 4 villains, 7 goodies; 3 wolves, 8 humans. If we don't get a wolf either today or tomorrow, we probably lose. INNOCENT Kit. I like her arguments and she's reasonable enough. I still dread her though. Pitch. I simply don't think he'd play the way he did if he was a wolf or the cobbler. Never mind that "there was probably a wolf involved among the first players", it's a single minor point against him when he's otherwise making sense. GUILTY Green. I think her attack on Nog was opportunistic because she knows what kind of player he is. And there's something very wrong with her not suspecting me because usually I annoy her and that makes her suspicious. Nog. He doesn't strike me as a wolf but I don't think cobbler would be that far-fetched... Which means he's probably the seer. Whoops I forgot we're not supposed to speculate on gifteds! (And before anyone gets carried away, that's a reference to a particular catastrophic game.) Shasta. Doesn't sit right with me at all. I can't explain it other than that his way of playing reminds me vividly of Shastawolf. Bom. Has posted little that isn't crazy, therefore he's here for now. Lottie. Because behaving unusually = evil, when it isn't that simple. Gal. I kind of like her because she seems nice and tra-la-lally enough, but I don't trust her. sally. Evil unless proven otherwise, and she isn't proving very apt at proving that because she doesn't post. Nerwen. Sneaky. Unless something drastic happens before I go to bed, I intend to vote for one of the three first Guilties. __________________ He bit me, and I was not gentle.