![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 | ||
Wisest of the Noldor
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Even Nerwen wasn't evil in the beginning." –Elmo. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Shade of Carn Dûm
|
Quote:
~~ Boro, the point of tp's idea would be a way of communicating the role of the "dreamt" to Elendil without the "dreamer" and "dreamt" being given away too easily. This chain you speak of is fine in the event of Amandil revealing himself- and are you assuming that he then explicitly states the role of the "dreamt"? That makes that person an immediate target for the Kings Men and killing them (in the case that it was an innocent) off in the night would then break the chain resulting in Elendil having to make a stab in the dark as to who he chooses to send a dream to next.
__________________
"I am, I fear, a most unsatisfactory person."
- (Letter #124 To Sir Stanley Unwin) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
Wisest of the Noldor
|
Quote:
Quote:
EDIT:x'd with Morsul.
__________________
"Even Nerwen wasn't evil in the beginning." –Elmo. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Laconic Loreman
|
Quote:
__________________
Fenris Penguin
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Shade of Carn Dûm
|
Quote:
Quote:
I wondering can identities be passed on secretively and successfully or do they often become so cryptic the intended recipient is none the wiser? My point is though the list of three before night falls is still a good idea to continue.
__________________
"I am, I fear, a most unsatisfactory person."
- (Letter #124 To Sir Stanley Unwin) |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,039
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() Hm. I need to look it over carefully. The main issue I see is trusting the "revealed" Amandil. I think it's certainly something to consider, but ultimately it's Amandil's decision. Quote:
x/d with Mänwe
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
|
Yes, also what I was getting at.
__________________
"I am, I fear, a most unsatisfactory person."
- (Letter #124 To Sir Stanley Unwin) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Beloved Shadow
|
![]()
So, we're done on the Amandil issue then? Everyone agrees he can step forward? (We'll trust his reveal, Inzil, because what KM would fake reveal on Day 1 with a potential counter-reveal out there?)
Regarding the Elendil list, the main concern is that people's participation sucks? Ugh, that's really really annoying. It seems this game has changed since I last played... Ah, well. If the rest of you don't mind, I'm going to do it anyway. At least that way if I happen to be selected as a recipient I'll have an established method for passing the info back. I suppose everyone else can do their own thing, so long as they believe it will work.
__________________
the phantom has posted.
This thread is now important. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
![]() ![]() |
![]()
Hey guys, how about those Elves, eh? I sure do appreciate those Elves. No question about that.
![]() I am trying to work out how Phantom's plan could be used against the village, should he be evil. I don't think there is a way, and I'm inclined to agree with everything he said earlier. But I need to think on it a bit more, because you can never fully trust a talented werewolver.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
![]() ![]() |
![]()
Should that be werewolfer? I think so.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | ||
Laconic Loreman
|
Quote:
Quote:
I will say, if we go forward with Amandil revealing (which ultimately will be up to Amandil now). Then the next day Amandil should do the "Guilty Elendil list," which should successfully transfer the dreamed of person to Elendil, and at the same time hide the dream from the KM. There isn't any further risk to Amandil, since he would be already revealed anyways. This making any sense?
__________________
Fenris Penguin
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Wight
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Home (either of them)
Posts: 151
![]() |
Quote:
Regarding participation, it seems like there is more potential in this game than there has been in the past few. And anyone has time to put up a randomised list. If it would become a habit for everyone, I think it would also be harder to forget, as you'd keep seeing the lists in every post in the first part of the day. I'd say yes to Amandil revealing. I'd also agree to lists today at the very least. Just to confirm, there's no CC, right? And just in case - if a KM decides to do a fake-reveal, Amandil, at least counter that! Otherwise we're stuck with a lot of problematicly full trust to a KM, and potentially to a chain of people after that.
__________________
But I will run until my feet no longer run no more Last edited by Pomegranate; 11-28-2012 at 10:01 AM. Reason: x/ed with two Eomers and Boro |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
![]() ![]() |
![]()
Correct P, there is no CC.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,039
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Wight
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Home (either of them)
Posts: 151
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
But I will run until my feet no longer run no more |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Beloved Shadow
|
![]() Quote:
Okay, so, here's what I'm thinking. Inzil has a point about consistency. If someone isn't doing much then suddenly says enough in which one could find an Elendil dream hint, that sticks out. Everyone ought to do something consistently- at the very least post enough in which to bury a hint. And so my 3-name thing seems like the bare minimum, right? I mean honestly- if asking everyone to randomly list 3 people in their first post each day is too much, we may as well modfire everyone. Show up in the morning and say "Inzil-Shasta-Nerwen" and bang, you're done. Totally not difficult. Now, for those that post more than others (e.g. me) I suppose it isn't technically necessary as I'm saying enough every day that slipping in a dream hint wouldn't be a problem, but I think the low-volume posters ought to be forced to agree to this plan. I mean- if they can't be bothered to type three people's names every 48 hours then we may as well lynch them. Also- did anyone give any thoughts on my idea for Isildur to just save whoever gets lynched today given the simple odds at this point in the village? Finally- are we ready for Amandil to step up?
__________________
the phantom has posted.
This thread is now important. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | ||
Laconic Loreman
|
Quote:
Quote:
Currently Elendil has one dream and sent it to one person. I would hope Elendil could rely on the information, but there's no way for Elendil to know this for sure. From what I understand, Elendil can double-check and send the same name to a different person, but that's wasting dream choices. And further, there would be no way for Elendil to know which person was telling the truth if he sent 2 people the same name and they relayed conflicting info. Amandil revealing would establish that reliable chain of dreams. So, to expand on my earlier example. 1. Amandil reveals today, Elendil dreams Brinn and sends it to Amandil. 2. Amandil either with creating the list that's been talked about or just saying "I saw an innocent" will let Elendil know Brinn's innocent and it would not give the trail away to the KM. 3. Elendil proceeds to give the next name to Brinn and it continues on from there... Now to your point Pom, what if in #3, Elendil is killed in the night. We could still follow the chain from Amandil who could say "The innocent I saw was Brinn" and then we would know to trust Brinn saying "I saw an innocent/KM." It wouldn't do much good for the KM to kill Amandil because the leaves Elendil still who could keep dreaming and continue the line of trustworthy dreams from Brinn. This would seem to put under Elendil extreme risk of being discovered and having no Ranger protection, with Anarion being occupied protecting the dream-recipients (the innocent ones). Ideally it would be great to give Elendil as many chances as possible, but at the same time, there needs to be an established way to make sure Elendil is actually being relayed trustworthy dreams, otherwise Elendil (and thus the rest of us) is left in the dark, unsure if the relayed information is true or not.
__________________
Fenris Penguin
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Laconic Loreman
|
Quote:
If Amandil doesn't reveal it frees up Anarion to protect whoever, but it leaves Elendil with no basis of knowing if the people receiving the dreams can be trusted. Worst case scenario in the event of Elendil gets killed anyway is we're basically left with nothing. If Amandil does reveal, and Elendil does go ahead sending the next dream to Amandil, Anarion would be pretty much obligated to protect Amandil and ensure the dream is "safe." This leaves the KM one free crack, and in worst case scenario they kill Elendil but we go to the next day having a trusted Amandil with one reliable dream. And in the event they don't get Elendil, then it sets up the system to get a chain of relaying trustworthy information back to Elendil. Edit: crossed with Morsul and Nerwen
__________________
Fenris Penguin
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |