Another one bites the dust....

[Bêthberry]

Originally Posted by Mithalwen

I was going by the bodleian websie. As for the book I was told and checked independently. Why should I need to go to Oxonmoot to learn about the contents of a published book?

You were referring to the apparent unauthorised use of one of CT's letters, so I assumed that meant you were referring to the Hilary biography. Sorry if I got confused between the two.

There was a discussion session at Oxonmoot about the biography where some of the material was displayed on a bulletin board. (It can be displayed, just not reproduced.) I didn't see all of it, but I was just wondering where you got your information about the content that was objectionable. It's a bit difficult arguing about the content of a book that has not been published.