![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
#4 | |
|
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,036
![]() ![]() |
Maybe the reason is based on a line in the Silmarillion, a line that was not taken up into the constructed version however [meaning Christopher Tolkien's version published in 1977].
Quote:
Elros' children are in a sense, denied immortality while having a measure of immortal blood, but in another sense they simply return to Eru's plan concerning the Half-elven. They are not denied death, nor are automatically sundered from the parent who chose mortality [who would likely wed another mortal I think] Elrond's children, if automatically 'immortal' but still having mortal blood, would be automatically denied a mortal death -- and if automatically mortal, would be automatically sundered from their parents. It was Earendil and Elwing that were given special dispensation, but again, why add Elros and Elrond? Well, we can say that they too would be automatically mortal without the same 'other doom' being granted to them. To me, I think the potential choice of immortality must include an extension to the children, otherwise [again, at least in light of the above text], having mortal blood, they will have no choice but to die while their parent[s] live[s] on until the end of the World and so on... ... of course even if all this holds up, one might then ask why it should be [in my opinion] the 'natural order of things' that anyone with mortal blood, in any measure, is automatically mortal, if no special doom is granted to them. I don't know ... ... but that's what I think it says in the Silmarillion of the later 1930s anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|