Tolkien's Secret Hidden Code

[Mithalwen]

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply. I was aware of every piece of criticism rather that despite having read a lot of criticism, I couldn't recall an instance of an attack of that nature. Nor do I have any issue with critical reviews which are part of the cut and thrust of the academic world. As long as not fraudulently concealed limitations as a scholar are not dishonourable, more inevitable...even if capacity for understanding were unlimited, time is not and there are so many things in the world to be interested in... hey ho.

I was thinking more of the "Gaudy Night" scenario (ironically Tolkien père disliked the book), where the supression of a thesis shattering document and its consequences are the catalyst for the drama. The scholar has enough integrity not to destroy the document and is thus incriminated.

Christopher's openess about errors is one of the factors that convince me he didn't know of a code, scheme and if he didn't know then it seems to me that claims of secret messages are delusional. But I agree that the anagrams are inherently unlikely even without the editorial context. Yet knowing that made it seem hardly worth investigating the substance.

[jallanite]

Originally Posted by Mithalwen

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply. I was aware of every piece of criticism rather that despite having read a lot of criticism, I couldn't recall an instance of an attack of that nature.

I am totally in agreement with your post. My intent was to indicate the feelings that arose when I read it. Any statement by anyone that they don’t think that they have read anything that makes a certain accusation tends to set me searching, when I have time, for something that makes that accusation, even when I disagree with the accusation. I have found such an accusation now. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Christopher_Tolkien . The pertinent remark is under 8 Sources needed and reads:

Are there any verifiable and reliable sources that demonstrate that [Christopher] Tolkien is in fact editing his father's notes rather than writing stories himself? There's a lot of uncited assumptions in that regard.--otherlleft 13:59, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

A good question, but it applies just as much to any writer, and also to those who have written material validating that writer, and to those who are validating them, and so on without end. Remember Åke Ohlmarks, Tolkien’s Swedish translator who believed, at the end of his life, that C. S. Lewis wrote most of The Lord of the Rings, not Tolkien. See http://white-eagle.tumblr.com/post/5...he-black-magic and https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...en/-M4MzZWNXHM for two sources. In the end all one can do is use one’s own intelligence and knowledge to evaluate writers.

[Morthoron]

I read the book blurb on Amazon:

This is probably the most controversial book ever published on Tolkien's 'Great Work' and possibly one of the most important.

Seriously? At 248 pages, I am wondering if the print is double-spaced and includes copious illustrations to flesh it out -- perhaps blank endpapers and a frontispiece as well. This sounds more like it should be a long, rambling post on a Tolkien forum. It certainly isn't a peer-reviewed academic work. Nothing I've read from Christopher Tolkien or any Tolkien scholar like Shippey or Flieger indicates cryptic codes or arcane anagrams hidden in Tolkien's work.

The question that seems most germane here is....why? To what purpose?

But the author made a serious mistake: If he/she wanted to sell more books, then he/she should have used anagrams to show that Tolkien was an Illuminati involved in a Templar conspiracy. I am sure Tom Hanks has another movie left in him.

[Dilettante]

You all know Tolkien wanted to reveal to us the location of both the Ark of the Covenant and the Holy Grail, so he wrote an epic tale just to encode his knowledge to the initiate.

[Inziladun]

Originally Posted by Dilettante

You all know Tolkien wanted to reveal to us the location of both the Ark of the Covenant and the Holy Grail, so he wrote an epic tale just to encode his knowledge to the initiate.

No, no, no. Tolkien had a Nostradamus experience, and was able to impart to the reader that Peter Jackson would one day sully his great work.
See, the Witch-king is also the Lord of the NaZgûl: NZ-- Jackson is from New Zealand! The Nazgûl were servants of the One Ring, and Jackson serves the Film Industry, the Sauron of our time. It's all so clear!

[Andsigil]

Originally Posted by Inziladun

No, no, no. Tolkien had a Nostradamus experience, and was able to impart to the reader that Peter Jackson would one day sully his great work.
See, the Witch-king is also the Lord of the NaZgûl: NZ-- Jackson is from New Zealand! The Nazgûl were servants of the One Ring, and Jackson serves the Film Industry, the Sauron of our time. It's all so clear!

Inzil, I think we've stumbled upon something important here:

[Inziladun]

I think it's finally been cracked, Andsigil. For further evidence, it's clear that New Line Cinema can be read into Necromancer's Love Child.