**Ruin of Doriath - Pre-Revision speculation/proposal thread** - The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum

Findegil · 10-08-2017, 05:32 PM

§37a (§20): Please specify a bit more what is not okay.

RD-EX-61.2: Agreed.

§43a (§27): I corrected Dwarf-road. But from Shibboleth we learn that 'Amord' would have been the translation of Ambarto. And that is the name that Feanor gave to his son instade of Umbarto 'Fated' that Nerdanel gave. So Amrod is burned with the ships, while Amros lifed.

RD-EX-79: The present tens is corrected. [near by] was added because the treassure was drowned actively by the Nandor-Elves of Beren in Ascar and the Great Ford leads over Duin Daer not over Ascar.

RD-EX-81: Why? The warning perfectly fits the warning to Thingol. And how else would we think Melian could react?

Last sentence: I don't think we should change this. It is a forward reference. But that isnot uncommon.

Respectfully
Findegil

10-08-2017, 05:32 PM	#23
Findegil King's Writer Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 1,721	§37a (§20): Please specify a bit more what is not okay. RD-EX-61.2: Agreed. §43a (§27): I corrected Dwarf-road. But from Shibboleth we learn that 'Amord' would have been the translation of Ambarto. And that is the name that Feanor gave to his son instade of Umbarto 'Fated' that Nerdanel gave. So Amrod is burned with the ships, while Amros lifed. RD-EX-79: The present tens is corrected. [near by] was added because the treassure was drowned actively by the Nandor-Elves of Beren in Ascar and the Great Ford leads over Duin Daer not over Ascar. RD-EX-81: Why? The warning perfectly fits the warning to Thingol. And how else would we think Melian could react? Last sentence: I don't think we should change this. It is a forward reference. But that isnot uncommon. Respectfully Findegil