![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
BoT-04: You're right - I copied and pasted less than I meant to.
BoT-15.1: It is curious that AAm has birds and flowers apparently existing during the age of the Lamps, while Ainulindale D as corrected says that they did not. But maybe that change to the Ainulindale post-dates those sections of AAm. Anyway, I'm skeptical about substituting "leaves". It seems like too great a liberty, and is a very different image from the flowers. I'd still rather remove it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
Actually, looking into BoT-15.1 further, I may have found the solution.
In AAm* (and in at least one emendation to the full AAm), Tulkas's wife becomes, instead of Nessa, the newly introduced 'Lëa the Young', a Maia. I had noticed this, but ignored it because the Valaquenta, which postdates AAm*, again has Nessa as his spouse and no mention of Lëa . However, in ignoring these changes I overlooked this: Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Aiwendil; 11-01-2017 at 06:04 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
That is perfect!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Wight
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 247
![]() |
I know is very repetitive, but I have no time to rewiew all the posts in this thread and in the thread of chapter two. I'm very oxidized in following the threads. I was comparing the drafts of Aiwendil and Findegil and I'm a bit confused because it seems that the first part of the chapter contains parts that I used to compose the Ainulindale and the last part is included by me in the Chapter of Valinor.
If it is no too laborious and you are agree, it would be helpful for me to have an updated text of the chapters in a new post that can print and compare quietly and easily with mine to give my opinion on the structure (only) pitily I will not can give texts edited by me. Now, retranslate would be very painful. Thanks and greetings. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
BoT-03: “fields of Aman” to “fields of Arda”: Why? It is a change from specific to unspecific. So why should the new comers of the Manwë party not decent into Arda first in the fields of Aman?
BoT-03.5: I propose to add a bit from LT here: Quote:
BoT-08.5: The detail that this would add is small. And fro reasons of safety which Aiwendil explained I agree to omit it. BoT-13b: Sorry Aiwendil, but I am not happy with you arrangement. Yes AAm should be preferred to avoid to much chopping up of the texts, but in this passages other sources have fuller accounts. The things they add might not be to very substantial but this phase of the story of Middle-earth is reported sparingly enough, so that I would like to include even tiny details. What about: Quote:
Quote:
Respectfully Findegil |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
BoT-03.5: I think Findegil's suggestion to use the Lost Tales passage here is good. However, I would then delete the phrase "lest Melkor should hinder the fulfilment of their labour for ever, and the Earth should wither ere it flowered", since exactly this motivation is made clear immediately after in the quote by Manwe: Quote:
BoT-13b: OK, I agree that there are some small details here that were missed in my version, and I think your suggestion is good. BoT-13.7, -13.8: I see the appeal of the idea here, but for me taking the words of Melko and giving them to Ulmo is going a bit too far. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
everything looks good.
BoT-13.7, -13.8: It cannot be Ulmo who says it, bc the next sentence says "In this there was some covert reflection upon Manwe and Ulmo" The way this is constructed it cannot be attributed to anyone besides Melkor without quite seeming to fit. The imagery of Ulmo being alone in the deep is also given later, in the next chapter, so we dont need to repeat it here. As for the second addition, I like it and I think it is in line with the later idea, minus the promises of Melkor. I would change Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |