![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
Gondowe, the Tale of years of the Third Age says this:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Wight
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 248
![]() |
But I think at least CT thought Cirdan had owned it from the beginning , is said by him in some book, possibly UT. Nevertheless it is more factible that one ring-->one elf. And of course this will fix that Mithrandir would come to ME at TA. (Don't know if you reached a conclusion about that matter)
Greetings Last edited by gondowe; 06-13-2018 at 12:23 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
I am confused as to what you are proposing. In all the documents that give details about the transmission of ownership of the rings, two were given to Gil-galad, and he distributed them to Elrond and Cirdan. This is in Of the Rings of Power and The History of Galadriel and Celeborn. The only text that says it was given directly to Cirdan is the VERY brief snippet in the Tale of Years of the Third Age, which is so compressed as to be barely a source of historical movement. I see no argument to give the ring to Cirdan directly, as this would go against all the source texts. As to the time of Gandalf's landing, there is also no debate. All the texts say that Gandalf, Saruman, and Radgast came during the Third Age around the time when the Shadow first came upon Mirkwood. Therefore there is also no reason to change or debate this. I included this event in my drafts for the Third Age, with some slight editing to reflect the new change that the two Blue Wizards came earlier in the Second Age.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Wight
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 248
![]() |
I'm not proposing anything.
I only say that "they had been held at first", was for me meant that Cirdan had Narya from the beginning (given by Gil-galad at the beginning as is stated in CGaC, despite the other note that says he gave him in the Last Alliance) of course it is, I think, a later note, but if the sentence in TLotR was, as I believed it was, would be definitive for have been published by the author. In my text is said that Celebrimbor gave Vilya and Narya to Gil-galad and Gil-galad gave Narya to Cirdan at the beginning (not in TLast Alliance period). Greetings |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Wight
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 248
![]() |
I have downloaded a UT book (digital) to check, and in the note 11 of THoGaC, CT says:
Earlier in this narrative (p.249) it is said that Gil-galad gave Narya, the Red Ring, to Círdan as soon as he himself received it from Celebrimbor, and this agrees with the statements in Appendix B to The Lord of the Rings and in Of the Rings of Power, that Círdan held it from the beginning. The statement here, at variance with the others, was added in the margin of the text. I think this is why I thought what I am saying, for the published text. Greetings |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
BY-HL-20: Yes, that is agreed, sorry for not being clear about this at once.
LA-SL-01: Okay, that is a better start. Agreed. LA-SL-08: Good to have you discussing with us gondowe! I think that you are right. The statement in LotR, Appendix B is not so unspecifc, in my oppinion. Specially if taken together with the first version of Concerning Galadriel and Celeborn it makes the use of the later nearly note impossible. I suggest therefore to change in this chapter to skip L-SL-08 but add the following: Quote:
Quote:
LA-SL-09: I can understand your concerns and I am not adamant on this addition. If you really think it superficial we can let it out. LA-SL-12: Oops, Malgalad to Amdír was a late change from ‘private Draft’ to ‘Draft’ in the earlier chapters and I missed to make it through out. LA-SL-13: The description of the War is already week. I think that this recapture of Minas Ithil is an essential part of the War strategy of the West. But you might of course be right that we will miss this passage dearly in the next chapter. I suppose we leave this point undecided until we have the full picture in both chapters and then chose were to use this passage. LA-SL-16: It is always a bit difficult to place a chapter break when working only on one side of it. So I for the moment agree to place this in the next chapter. If when discussing this I feel that it would better be move we can easily re-open this point. LA-SL-17: Yes, when used in the next chapter this sentence is superficial. I used it because I was unwilling to state that Isildur moved to Minas Anor next, which is what followed in The Rings of Power. Respectfully Findegil Last edited by Findegil; 06-14-2018 at 04:05 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
LA-SL-08: I think the second option is best. Personally I think 'before he died' is not specific, and so we should simply leave the text as it is, and not include RP-SL-24.5 and LA-SL-15.5.
LA-SL-09: I think it is safer to leave it out. LA-SL-13/16/17: This is fair. We can re-open discussion on these points later if you find the next chapter inadequate. I think with that we have reached the end of the first round of edits on the entirety of the Second Age material! That's incredible, especially considering the unfinished and uncertain state of most of the Second Age events, and I think we have made an incredible narrative out of some very difficult source material! I'll try to prep the first Fading Years chapter for tomorrow. Last edited by ArcusCalion; 06-13-2018 at 11:53 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |