![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Okay, I agree to the changes so far. The chapter The Tale of Agarorn and Arwen looks fine for me. What follows is my draft for the inclusion of the The Quest to Erebor material. I will give it in full even so TS-SL-01 & TS-SL-02 are unchanged, but I would like to change the structure a bit as well. I think we should puch TS-SL-01 & TS-SL-02 into the chapter Concerning Gandalf, Saruman, and the Shire, It does not fit their well, but better than in a chapter named The Quest of Erebor as this one should benamed know. As I would like to use that title here I would suggest to rename the earlier chapter Sauron Defeated to The Last Alliance.
Quote:
FY-HL-14.2: I took this a chaptertitle since it is the best summary of what follows. FY-HL-14.4: This first Sub-chapter title might be left out, but it fit well and if we decised to keep TS-SL-01 & TS-SL-02 in this chapter the sub-heading is usefull. TS-QE-01: I replaced part of the text from LotR, Appendix A with this passage as it seems the fuller account to me. TS-QE-02: Here we begin with the real text of The Quest of Erebor. As we shift here from Frodo reporting Gandalf’s telling of the story to a straight forward reporting, we have to remove a lot ‘I’ and ‘he’ and so on. Bisde that in this fist part telling about Gandalf’s thought at the time we have to change the time. I will not farther comment on these changes which are all marked as grammatical. TS-QE-03: I removed this paragraph change to make clearer that what follows is Gandalf’s thought. TS-QE-04: I added this part of the Appendix here where I think it fits best. TS-QE-05: This direct address of Gandalf to the hobbits as his audience has to go. TS-QE-06: We take up the text of the The Quest of Erebor where we left it when inserting TS-QE-04. TS-SL-03b: That passage is what I preserved of the original editing of ArcusCalion. The direct talk of Gandalf and Thorin at this occasion is not given eleswhere. TS-QE-07: We take up the text of the The Quest of Erebor where we left it when inserting TS-SL-03b. TS-QE-08: This comes from a later part of the Appendix of The Quest of Erebor. But in our retelling it fits best here. TS-QE-09: Again we take up the text of The Quest of Erebor where we left it when inserting TS-QE-08. TS-QE-10: Thorin’s long tale is not given in The Quest of Erebor, but I think it is need in our work to make the allusion to the Map and the Key of Erebor that will follow understandable. Beside the version in The Hobbit that is unusable for us and LotR, Appendix A that we have already used, we have this version from the 1960 revision of The Hobbit. TS-QE-11: Here the text of the 1960 Hobbit ends and we have to take it from the original. TS-QE-12: And addition given in the 1960 Hobbit. TS-QE-13: And addition given in the 1960 Hobbit. TS-QE-14: The 1960 Hobbit has here Thorin speak of him self and not all his people. TS-QE-15: Again we take up the text of The Quest of Erebor where we left it when inserting TS-QE-10. TS-QE-16: I think this direct thought of Gandalf is worth including. TS-QE-17: Again we take up the text of The Quest of Erebor where we left it when inserting TS-QE-16. TS-QE-18: This comes form an earlier point in the Appendix of The Quest of Erebor as an answer to Pippins question. But if we want to include it, here seems the best palce. Of course the direct address to Pippin has to be removed. TS-QE-19: Again we take up the text of The Quest of Erebor where we left it when inserting TS-QE-18. TS-QE-20: Gandalf’s reasoning about Bilbo not being married seems worth the iteruption. I reformed the commentary of Christopher Tolkien into a footnote. But if that is not aoky we can leave it out. TS-QE-21: Again we take up the text of The Quest of Erebor where we left it when inserting TS-QE-20. TS-QE-22: Here we change over to the long account of the discussion in Thorins Hall. TS-QE-23: Again we take up the text of The Quest of Erebor where we left it when inserting TS-QE-22, but only for very short insert, giving Gandalf’s assumption that it was a mistake not to see Bilbo first. TS-QE-24: This allusion to the attack on Dol Guldur has to go. Gandalf does at this point not know that he would be succsefull in persuading the council to the attack. TS-QE-25: As Christopher Tolkien tells us he thinks that this was left out untentianal, so we should restore it. TS-QE-26: Again direct address by Gandalf to his audience. TS-QE-27: I took up the text of The Quest of Erebor where we left it when inserting TS-QE-22, marking what was left out or used in TS-QE-23 as deleted. TS-QE-28: The account of how long Thrain had been in prison and the guessing of how he could keep Map and Key are not found elsewhere. TS-QE-29: Again we take up the text of The Quest of Erebor where we left it when inserting TS-QE-28. FY-HL-14.6: If we take up this story we should as well take the sub-chapter heading. Now to the story itself: It is in a way contray to The Hobbit. But on the other hand it expands a few paragraphs into on full chapter. And the contradiction is only to one sentence that was added in to the second addition and created the biggest unconsitence between Hobbit and LotR. Before the Last Bridge over Mitheithel was introduce into the text of The Hobbit the episode of the pony jumping into the river and all the adventure with the Trolls were placed near to Bruinen some way lower than the ford. When JRR Tolkien added the Bridge he did it in a way that switched the secne of the Troll adventure to a point observeable from near to the Bridge. In itself that did not creat a problem, but with Aragorn, a Ranger in great haste to reach Rivendell, needing days to find that spot the account as given in The Hobbit is impossible. Beside that the journey of Thorin and Co. on Ponies is much to slow compared to Frodo & Co. on foot. The expanded story helps to explain that. Thus I think we should take the opportunity given with in our chapter The Quest of Erebor to give this far more detailed alternative account of the journey up to the point of crossing the Mitheithel. See farther TS-QE-35 to TS-QE-38. TS-QE-30: We start with a kind of summary of the events at Bag-end, to make clear that they realy set out. TS-QE-31: Here we take up the text form the 1960 Hobbit. TS-QE-32: The detail about the All-welcome Inn and the roads used by stangers is new and given nowhere else. TS-QE-33: I thought it worth mentioning that they did not expect to find the last Inn deserted. As Gandalf and Thorin had been at Bree only in March, the desertion of the Inn must have been rather recently. TS-QE-34: Even so JRR Tolkien did not mention it, I think Weathertop should be included as landmark of the journey. TS-QE-35: Here I skipt the episode of the pony jumping into Mitheithel. If included we would creat the same problem as mentione under FY-HL-14.6. TS-QE-36 & TS-QE-37: Giving here the farther course of the road allows as to make the mind of the reader work out the rest of the correction I attemped to do: If Thorin & Co. followed the raod the Bruinen, then that is where the Pony jumps into and where they are near to the Troll lair. TS-QE-38: The transition might be a bit forced, but that the break would be hard at the end of this additions from The Quest of Erebor and the 1960 Hobbit was clear from the outset. FY-HL-15b: I called this editing 15b because it is set in a quite different palce and position. TS-FR-01b: As I used part of this text before, the point were I took up that text is changed. TS-QE-39: This is an allusion to LotR, so we should remove it. FY-HL-15.5: I desiered a sub-chapter brake here and this title seemed the only one fitting the following at all. If someone has a better idea, I am open for discussions. TS-FR-01.5: This is only to mark that we follow the text of the Prologue. In the effect I inserted the headline into it. TS-QE-40: As we start out by saying we would not tell any thing about the rest of Bilbos adventure we have to qualify this here I think. TS-QE-41: Gandalf absents from the longer part of the Quest and the reason for it seems important enough to be mentioned. TS-QE-42: We take up the text of the Prologue where we left it inserting TS-QE-41. TS-QE-43: Here we switch finaly back to LotR, Appendix A. The slight redundance seems okay to me, since Appendix A adds the detail of Bard as the slayer of Smaug. TS-FR-03 & TS-SL-04: These are unchanged. TS-QE-44: Here I added a detail about Saurons orgininal plans and the effect of disturbing him. TS-SL-04.5 to TS-SL-12. These are again unchanged. A long post and a lot of text added. I hope at least a part of it makes it to the final version. Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
As this post is very very long, I think I will first make some general responses:
1) First thing first: WOW! This is an incredibly skillful and labor-intensive draft, and I must congratulate you, Fin, on executing it as well as you did! Your draft has convinced me that we can and should include The Quest for Erebor into this chapter. 2) To your point about shifting the short description of the events of Turin and Folcwine's sons to the previous chapter I agree. 3) In terms of Chapter headings and subheadings: I think that we do not need more than The Quest for Erebor (as the chapter name) and Of the Finding of the Ring as a subheading. I know they must both contain a LOT of information, but I think that is ok. The first subheading you suggested, A Well-Planned Party is not needed once we shift the first few paragraphs to the previous chapter, and (as I will argue below) The Broken Bridge belongs to a segment of the draft which I think should be removed entirely. Finally, Sauron Defeated, while it would be nice to have a subheading here, I think it is innacurate. He is not defeated in this case, as is made very plain by the text. He simply retreats before them, which was his plan in the end anyway, so he is in no way defeated. In addition, I think we should avoid creating chapter names from no source (like The Last Alliance) and so [i]Sauron Defeated would be better served there. To combat the length of the chapter, we can discuss making Of the Finding of the Ring into its own chapter dealing with the actual adventure of Bilbo, as opposed to The Quest for Erebor which would deal with the lead-up to the adventure. 4) The Inclusion of the 1960 Hobbit revisions: To begin, I will lay out what is used: 1) the bit about the sorrows of the Dwarves as told by Thorin, and 2) the first few chapters of the adventure from setting out from Bagend to the Trolls. First of all, I think to use the texts of these revisions is very risky. In many places they are extremely similar to the text of the Hobbit itself. As including The Hobbit in the story lies outside the scope of the project, I think to include a retelling in the exact same scope and narrative style and level of detail also goes against the project's scope. However, the two pieces used are not the same. The discussion of Thorin about the sorrows of his house (1) is (I think) different, simply because of the reason you included it: we know it happened at that point of the story, so to assume it was the same account is not unreasonable, and using the draft version is different enough from the published for it to work. However, for (2) I see no benefit to giving a highly detailed description of their adventure up to right before Rivendell, and then summarizing the entire 2/3 of the remaining narrative in one or two paragraphs. If the entire adventure must be summarized, then we should simply summarize it, instead of giving some of it in full and then reverting to summary. In addition, I worry that revising the speech of the characters in the Hobbit is tantamount to contradiction of the published work. For all of these reasons, I am fundamentally opposed to include the revised text describing their adventures (TS-QE-31 to 37). Aside from these things mentioned, overall the composition of the draft was incredibly good, and any more detailed concerns I lay out will be restricted to differences of opinion about tense changes, or how to present Gandalf's thoughts. In terms of the structure of the additions and changes, it was phenomenally done. In the following post I will lay out my specific comments, and I'll try to have that post up at least by sometime tomorrow. I would still love to be able to see a full draft posted in the private forum, as opposed to simply selections, as it makes the commenting and editing process much easier. Last edited by ArcusCalion; 07-11-2018 at 12:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
Everything to which I do not respond (and everything not mentioned in the previous post) I agree to.
TS-QE-03: I agree to this addition here, but I would edit it differently, as your version does not flow naturally. Quote:
TS-QE-05: This is fine, but at the end of the addition, there are some sentences about picking Bilbo specifically, which I think are out of place. They should be moved down to TS-QE-18, or removed entirely. TS-QE-31 to 37: As I said in my last post, I think these should be removed, and it can flow as it did in my own draft, starting with TS-QE-30 after the subheading Of the Finding of the Ring, or perhaps it can be a new chapter. The rest seems fine. As can be seen, I have relatively few changes, as this was a masterful draft. There may be more things for me to comment on when I see the full text, especially spelling and grammatical errors, but in terms of structure these are my only concerns. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||||
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
1) Thank you for the flowers, I am not sure they are warranted.
2) Okay. 3) Oaky we leave A Well-Planned Party out and if we are done with the discussion about the corresponding content we can decised about The Broken Bridge. I can see your reason and agree to use Sauron defeated at its original place. But nonetheless I think we need and replacement for it here in this chapter. As we have no good title I would add an editorial * * *. I have no problem with the length of the chapter and therefore would keep Of the Finding of the Ring as sub heading. 4) Interisting, I thought that focus of the discussion would be exactly oposit, as the fist addition from the 1960 Hobbit I actually had to use part of the book in print to get a full text. Anyhow I am happy with that talk of Thorin about the Dwarves of Erebor finding acceptance. Nonetheless I will break a lance for the inclusion of The Broken Bridge: I think we have done something very similar with material from The Quest of Erebor: First we have the description of the meeting and Discussion of Gandalf and Thorin and Gandalf’s visit to the shire and in the Blue Moutains for a second time, after that we have a short summary of Gandalf’s visit to Bilbo and the events at the afternoon. Then we get a broad retelling of the discussion between Gandalf and Thorin during the night, when Bilbo has gone to sleep. So we have detailed telling of events left out from The Hobbit mingled with short summary of events reported in that book. The same would be true if we include The Broken Bridge. The corosponding passage to all that I added for this sub-chapter from The Hobbit reads: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
TS-QE-03: Agreed, so I would avoid the following us of ‘he’ because the reverence is not fully clear: Quote:
Respectfully Findegil |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
3) I agree to the use of the '*****' as an editorial distinction, as I think it is enough. I as well agree with keeping Of the Finding of the Ring as a subheading. As to The Broken Bridge see below.
4) Hmm actually seeing it all laid out is indeed very different. I hadn't realized just how short this portion of the adventure was.... Very well, I will agree to the inclusion of these changes, albeit somewhat reluctantly. I do not deny that it is something I had wanted to be able to do somehow when I learned about the 1960 revisions, perhaps to include in the project a 'revised' Hobbit, but I see now that this way is better. Very well Fin, you have won me over . I do not think Aiwendil will be that easy to convince, however, if he ever gets to this draft. I will also keep The Broken Bridge as a sub-heading.TS-QE-03: Agreed. I must say, after all that whirlwind of confusion, that turned out to be remarkably simple. Well done Fin! Your flowers are most absolutely deserved. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Sorry for not providing these changes at once with my draft, but I was hesitating about them until I had posted the draft:
Quote:
Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
nice, looks good, some good tidbits!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|