![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
That is fine, but can I ask why you don't want to repeat that the Blue Wizards came in the Second Age?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Sorry, I should have explained that directly. It will make things easier if the decision that they have come in the second age is re-discussed with a different result. Since I am sure this discussion will occur, I think it is best to be prepared as far as possible for every possible outcome. It is clear that any other decision then the one we have taken will have a great impact on the chapter Note on the Five Wizards. But with the editing we have done here and in the chapter The End of the Third Age they might be unaffected.
Let us assume the decision would be changed to: we are not sure enough to include a clear statement of the arrival time of the Blue Wizards into our text. Then probably the content of Note on the Five Wizards would be include in volume 3. If the decision would be changed to: we are sure they came in the Third Age, then again the placement of the content of Note on the Five Wizards in volume 3 would be an option, but then of course a placement here would be an possibility as well. But anyhow, if we would make a clear statement here, without need, we would have to remember it and change it if the decision is changed. Reading farther in that same mood we should probably change RS-SL-32b and RS-SL-32.2. This is my suggestion: Quote:
Findegil |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
I think we can keep it for now, and if we change our consensus on the Second Age change, then we can revisit this.
I like this change. After reading gandalf's draft for the addition of some of the Istari material to Of the Five Wizards, I agree with his placement, and so it needs to be removed from this draft. We can call that marker RS-SL-31.35. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Agreed.
Respectfully Findegil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||||
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
![]() |
This is a pretty remarkable chapter, the variety of sources used is staggering. I had not known about that "Realms of Tolkien" interview, Findegil sure knows a lot of obscure sources. With that said, here are my comments:
1) In RS-SL-16, we should change "It is" to "It was" for consistent tense. 2) In RS-SL-21 the text reads (without markings) Quote:
3) In the "Concerning Hobbits" section, I propose a few small changes which I think will make it flow better and read more naturally. I propose we change "Eriador" in RS-SL-29.5 to "that land". The way the text currently stands is as follows: Quote:
4) There is a typo near the end of RS-SL-30.8: Quote:
5) The section on the Istari felt very unorganized and disjointed to me. I will first make some comments on how the text is currently structured, then propose a re-organization of it. The first paragraph is an introduction and is mostly linguistic. The second paragraph describes how men perceived them, while the third describes that they are actually Maiar who came over the Sea and were met by Cirdan at the Grey Havens. The fourth paragraph describes the order in which they came. The fifth paragraph contains almost entirely redundant information: they came over the Sea and met Cirdan, they appeared in the likeness of Men, the order in which they came. There are a few pieces of information which are new or state explicitly what was previously only implied, namely that Cirdan knew where they came from and he revealed this information to Galadriel and Celeborn. At the end of the first paragraph it says that "...none save maybe Elrond, Cirdan and Galadriel discovered of what kind they were or whence they came". This says "maybe" but later we make it explicit: Cirdan knew and revealed this information to Galadriel and Celeborn. The fifth paragraph gives the names Curunir and Saruman, then these names are introduced again in the sixth paragraph. The end of the fifth paragraph says the Blue Wizards "went into the east of Middle-earth, and do not come into these tales." Then the sixth paragraph says "they passed into the East" and gives some guesses as to what happened to them. The second paragraph says they began "to move Elves and Men to beware of their peril" then in the fifth paragraph "to move Elves and Men and all living things of good will to valiant deeds." Sorry if this sounds hyper-critical, I realize the redundancy is because many of the sections are later additions and they come from a variety of sources. Here is the idea for my proposed re-organization: first is the linguistic introduction to "Istari" and "Wizard". Then a physical description of them as they are seen by men before they truly make themselves known. As the shadow of Sauron grows, they interact with Men more, who think they are Elves. But they are actually Maiar sent by the Valar. After this is a paragraph describing what they look like when they first arrive but not giving their names. Then the names and dwelling places of Saruman and Radagast are given. After this is speculation about the blue wizards. And finally, a description of Gandalf. Here is the draft, I have re-numbered all of the edits: Quote:
RS-SL-31.3: This first paragraph is about the Wizards in general, including the Blue Wizards. The statement "they belonged solely to the Third Age" is not true of all the Wizards. I removed "solely" to make the statement more ambiguous. RS-SL-31.4: There is no ambiguity later that Cirdan, Galadriel and Celeborn know where the Wizards came from. RS-SL-32.2: This is more physical description and ends with the information that they had many powers. Then the next sentence says they did not reveal these powers. In between RS-SL-34.1 and RS-SL-34.2: I didn't make changes here, but I have a concern. This paragraph explicitly states the Valar had "the consent of Eru" but in the "Five Wizards" chapter this is ambiguous. Should we remove the ambiguity in that chapter? RS-SL-36.3: I have removed the general statement that Saruman "came into the realm of Gondor and there abode" and replaced it with his more specific dwelling place. RS-SL-36.5: After the name and dwelling place of Curunir comes the name and dwelling place of Radagast. Then in the next two paragraphs are the names and "dwelling places" of the Blue Wizards and Mithrandir. |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
1) RS-SL-16: Agreed.
2) RS-SL-21: Since Falastur is a name under which Tarannon toke up his kingship. I think we should put in both names. 3) RS-SL-29.5: I am okay with the change ‘{Eriador}that land’. RS-SL-29.6 & RS-SL-29.7: Here I am as well okay with the change ‘{The Harfoots}They’ in RS-SL-29.6. But I would leave ‘The Harfoots’ stand in RS-SL-29.7 – if we change it here as well we will create 3 sentences in a row starting with ‘They’, which I think awkward. 30.05: Agreed. 4) Thanks fro pointing it out. 5) I am not against the reordering. But I have to check that more in detail, and I am sure that we must work on the editing and the editing markers. It is a no go to have the same marker for different editings. If you feel it necessary to renumber, please change the middle letters. Respectfully Findegil |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Coming back to the reorganisation of The Istari part of this chapter. As I said, the editing markers have given me a headache, and I think we must change them to allow keeping track of the development as good as might be. Therefore I will at first give here as list of the corresponding editing markers. First will be the markers of our old version, then the corresponding one of gandalf85’s editing and last the combined one that should be used farther on. The list is sorted in the order in which they appear in the text as edited by gandalf85. Please mark that I do not propose hear any change in the content. My idea about that will follow later on. In this first part of my post, I am only concerned with the editing markers:
RS-SL-31 / RS-SL-31.1 => RS-SL-31g RS-SL-31.2 / RS-SL-31.2 => RS-SL-31.2g n.a. / RS-SL-31.3 => RS-SL-31.23g n.a. / RS-SL-31.4 => RS-SL-31.4g RS-SL-31.25 / RS-SL-32.1 => RS-SL-31.25g n.a. / RS-SL-32.2 => RS-SL-32.2g n.a. / n.a. (gandalf85 put in a paragraph brake between ‘... and heeded them little.’ and ‘But as the shadow of Sauron ...’. I like that change, but it is an editorial act that we have to mark. => RS-SL-32.25g n.a. / RS-SL-33.1 => RS-SL-33.1g n.a. / RS-SL-34.1 => RS-SL-34.1g n.a. / n.a. => RS-SL-34.3g (new addition, see commentary below) RS-SL-31.35 / RS-SL-34.2 => RS-SL-31.35g n.a. / RS-SL-35.1 => RS-SL-35.1g n.a. / RS-SL-35.2 => RS-SL-35.2g RS-SL-31.3c / n.a. => RS-SL-31.3g This marks the beginning of the sentence about Saruman that goes on with: ‘was one of noble mien and bearing, with raven hair, and a fair voice, and he was clad in white; ...’. Since this first part is an editorial addition, I think a maker is to be used here. n.a. / RS-SL-35.3 => RS-SL-35.3g RS-SL-31.6 / RS-SL-35.4 => RS-SL-31.6h (proposed by me to be changed a bit, see commentary below) RS-SL-31.5 / RS-SL-36.1 => RS-SL-31.5g RS-SL-32.5b / RS-SL-36.2 => RS-SL-32.5g n.a. / RS-SL-36.3 => RS-SL-36.3g n.a. / RS-SL-36.4 => RS-SL-36.4g RS-SL-32.8 / RS-SL-36.5 => RS-SL-32.8g n.a. / n.a. => RS-SL-32.9g (new addition, see commentary below) RS-SL-33b / RS-SL-36.6 => RS-SL-33g RS-SL-34 / RS-SL-36.7 => RS-SL-34g n.a. / RS-SL-37.1 => RS-SL-37.1g n.a. / n.a. => RS-SL-37.2g (new addition, see commentary below) RS-SL-32.7 / RS-SL-37.3 => RS-SL-32.7g RS-SL-34.5 / RS-SL-38.1 => RS-SL-34.5g n.a. / RS-SL-38.2 => RS-SL-38.2g RS-SL-34.6 / RS-SL-38.3 => RS-SL-34.6g I kept the markers of gandalf85 as much untouched as possible, I only re-established the old markers, where a corresponding change had already occurred and I changed the number of new changes only where unfortunately the number used by gandalf85 had already been in use. Where I had to give new numbers, I tried my best to choose them in good relation to the neighbours. To mark that all these changes are in correspondence with gandalf85’s re-arrangement I added the small letter ‘g’ after the number. Over all this leads to a somewhat unorganised numbering, but it keeps the correspondence as good as possible, which is of greater importance. Okay after that painstaking organisational work, let’s come to the content: I will not try to comment on the formatting issues I found. Instate I will give below the text, as I think it should, be with all the corrected editing markers and as nicely formatted as I could manage it. The content (after cleaning) should be nearly the same as proposed by gandalf85, which means I agreed to his re-arrangement. On the few differences that I introduced I will comment here before giving the text: I found a typo within RS-SL-34.1g: ‘... but clad in bodies of as of Men, ...’ must be ‘... but clad in bodies as of Men, ...’. RS-SL-34.3g: I added here ‘old but vigorous,’ from ORP. This fact is mentioned in the text, but I think it is worth repeating here. RS-SL-31.6h: It is clear that we should not give the information that Círdan gave Narya to Gandalf, but that Círdan at once referred Gandalf higher than most should probably be kept. My reasoning is that we later tell that Saruman discovered that Círdan had given Narya to Gandalf, so I think we should give some starting point for his suspicion and research. RS-SL-32.9g: I did not check how this was in the original text, but in our editing, only by counting of it becomes clear that Radagast is the ‘Brown Messenger’. And that counting could only be done after reading through all the sub-chapter. At this point in the chapter only White is given to Saruman. In the next paragraph Blue is given to the Wizards going of the stage to the east and only in the last paragraph Grey is given to Gandalf. Especially since we changed the order in which we mention the Istari here from that in which they came to Middle-earth as given earlier in this chapter, I think we should make it here easier for our readers, by building an editorial addition calling him here including the epithet from LotR ‘Radagast the Brown’. RS-SL-37.2g: This is a snippet take from another place of the Istari essay that gandalf85 did not include when he rearranged the text. I think it works very well here to explain why we do know so little about the pair. Okay, here at the long last the text as it stands after my editing: Quote:
Findegil |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |