The North Kingdom and the Dúnedain - The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum

Findegil · 01-12-2019, 09:27 AM

1) The problem with this special inunivers authorial inserts is that they give a clear evidence that the text was written by a Hobbit of the late Thrid Age. But that our work does not claim to have an inunivers equivalent as a hohle or in all its parts, does at least in my opinion not mean that the divers inunivers authors shouldn’t came through here or there. I think the question is rather if they are not out of place in the new sorounding in which we put these texts.

2) I agree that we left these passage intentionaly stand. And I think that this is specially okay, since we did not even use a full sentence.

3) Thanks for finding these.
I think we should use the British ‘sceptre’ since Tolkien is an English author.

4) Agreed. We should name that change NKD-SL-06.35.

Respectfully
Findegil

01-12-2019, 09:27 AM	#10
Findegil King's Writer Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 1,721	1) The problem with this special inunivers authorial inserts is that they give a clear evidence that the text was written by a Hobbit of the late Thrid Age. But that our work does not claim to have an inunivers equivalent as a hohle or in all its parts, does at least in my opinion not mean that the divers inunivers authors shouldn’t came through here or there. I think the question is rather if they are not out of place in the new sorounding in which we put these texts. 2) I agree that we left these passage intentionaly stand. And I think that this is specially okay, since we did not even use a full sentence. 3) Thanks for finding these. I think we should use the British ‘sceptre’ since Tolkien is an English author. 4) Agreed. We should name that change NKD-SL-06.35. Respectfully Findegil