![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
![]() |
Yeah, you're right, it is a pretty vague "call-forward". OK, I agree to keep it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
![]() |
There is a footnote mentioning Balin in the "Hunt for the Ring" chapter, and I figured we should include Balin's expedition to Moria in the main text. The Tale of Years only contains for the entry 2989: "Balin leaves Erebor and enters Moria." However, Return of the Shadow contains a lengthier description which is not in the final published FotR. I propose we place it in "Of the Finding of the Ring" before TS-SL-07b. TS-FR-03 describes Bilbo returning home, so it has to come after that. Here is the text:
Quote:
I think we should also include the fate of Balin later on, possibly in the "Treason of Isengard" chapter when the company arrives at Moria. I will look for something to add when I post my comments on that chapter. Last edited by gandalf85; 02-02-2019 at 02:14 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
I like this very much! Have we mentioned Balin at all before this? If not we may need to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
![]() |
"Of Durin's Folk" has two mentions of Balin, and Balin is there when Gandalf has a discussion with Thorin about the Quest for Erebor (he even has a few speaking lines in our text).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
![]() |
Perfect!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
TS-FR-05: Very nice find! I would only edit t in one place a bit differently:
Quote:
I am as well a bit unsure about the evil news at the end. In the original context it would be made clear in the next chapter that this evil news did not come form Moria, but from Mordor. But in our case it is just an evil forshadowing. For the time being I would let it stand. Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
![]() |
That change looks good to me, Fin.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|