![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 | ||
|
Laconic Loreman
|
Quote:
[/QUOTE] All good points. I'll repeat my disclaimer that I'm not saying we must ignore the Huey voters yesterday, because there can't be wolf-on-wolf. I feel my judgment has been kind of off so far and trying to be more pragmatic/methodical. What do I know currently from the night kills and the lynches? The night kills have been safe. Effective? Yes. But no risks taken. The lynches for all their chaos have gone extremely favorably. So what's more suspicious looking? The votes of people who lynched a now known wolf? The votes of people who voted for and unknown Mac and not HueyWolf? The votes of people who didn't vote for either? Today, I'm not interested in trying to consider wolf-on-wolf strategy. There's still a ton of people, which means the Mac-votes and the "didn't vote for either" votes, are the more suspicious voters. Quote:
Kit. Ranger. Quarantined. Safe? Yes. Effective? Yes. Edit: crossed with Steve.
__________________
Fenris Penguin
|
||
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|