The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum


Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page

Go Back   The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum > Middle-Earth Discussions > The Movies
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-2007, 03:45 PM   #1
Sauron the White
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 903
Sauron the White has just left Hobbiton.
Mithalwen... you said this

Quote:
Given that The Lord of the Rings was originally published without its appendices, I wonder whether legally speaking they form a part of of the "The Lord of the Rings" for the purposes of film rights
I believe your information is not accurate. I have a US first edition of ROTK published in 1955 and it has the appendicies as part of the book. I checked that edition before I posted this thread this morning just to make sure.

davem ... please understand that I am not finding any fault or error with Christopher putting together the SIL or finding a publisher for it. I am very glad that he did it. My point is more of a legal question based on the idea that when they bought the film rights to LOTR, everything in the appendicies was part of it. And that includes material that JRRT himself said was from The Silmarallion. When he used the term it was not really as a published book since that would not happen until after his death several years later. He was referring to it as a body of work on the First Age.

My point is this: is it not possible for a legal department to advocate that since the legally own that information in the Appendicies for the purposes of film, that they have the right to other more detailed information that JRRT had also written up until that time and referred to by name or character or event in LOTR?

I am not an attorney and would love to hear from one on this subject. But I do think it is an interesting perspective that is different than the conventional wisdom.
Sauron the White is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 04:48 PM   #2
davem
Illustrious Ulair
 
davem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the home of lost causes, and forsaken beliefs, and unpopular names,and impossible loyalties
Posts: 4,240
davem is battling Black Riders on Weathertop.davem is battling Black Riders on Weathertop.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sauron the White View Post

davem ... please understand that I am not finding any fault or error with Christopher putting together the SIL or finding a publisher for it. I am very glad that he did it. My point is more of a legal question based on the idea that when they bought the film rights to LOTR, everything in the appendicies was part of it. And that includes material that JRRT himself said was from The Silmarallion. When he used the term it was not really as a published book since that would not happen until after his death several years later. He was referring to it as a body of work on the First Age.
No - he drew on material he had already written (& invented a great deal for the Appendices of LotR). The fact that he referred to 'The Silmarillion' is neither here nor there, in that at that time The Silmarillion didn't exist in a completed form. I honestly don't see where you're coming from with all this. Are you saying that if a writer sells the movie rights to one novel of a series that contains references to a previous novel in the series then the buyer of the rights somehow owns all the novels in the series - even the pnes that haven't been written up to that point?

I mean, are you saying that they have the rights to everything Tolkien wrote on M-e that could come under the heading 'The Silmarillion' - because a good part of it was written post LotR. Or should it only include M-e writings written up to the time Tolkien sold the rights? Or should it only include the Quenta Silmarillion proper - thereby excluding the Grey Annals/Annals of Valinor, the Gest of Beren & Luthien, the Narn i Hin Hurin, Athrabeth, Laws & Customs, the Numenor material, et al? What do you consider to constitute 'The Silmarillion' - everything Tolkien ever wrote on M-e? How much of the Gondolin material is part of The Silmarillion? The Book of Lost Tales material is not 'The Silmarillion' & the Later Tuor was written post LotR & not part of the Quenta Silmarillion proper.

Quote:
My point is this: is it not possible for a legal department to advocate that since the legally own that information in the Appendicies for the purposes of film, that they have the right to other more detailed information that JRRT had also written up until that time and referred to by name or character or event in LOTR?
No, it isn't - apart from the fact that, as I've pointed out just now, what constitutes 'The Silmarillion' as referred to in LotR could be argued over till the cows come home, & what, exactly, was sold has been accepted by all parties for a long time now.
davem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 06:26 PM   #3
Sauron the White
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 903
Sauron the White has just left Hobbiton.
Things are only accepted - until they are not. History and human nature have shown that again and again and again.

Up until recently, there seemed to be no interest in filming events other than the main body of LOTR and HOBBIT. And that still may be the way things are in reality. I, we, many of us are speculating about things that are only seen as shadows in the cave lit by a fire which at times burns bright and then wanes. So this is conjecture.

My point is a simple one that I feel nearly everyone has overlooked. The holder of the film rights to LOTR and HOBBIT owns much much more than most people have taken for granted. And, if they were willing to push the issue with some creative legal thinking, they could own even more.
Sauron the White is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 06:44 PM   #4
William Cloud Hicklin
Loremaster of Annúminas
 
William Cloud Hicklin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,330
William Cloud Hicklin is battling Black Riders on Weathertop.William Cloud Hicklin is battling Black Riders on Weathertop.William Cloud Hicklin is battling Black Riders on Weathertop.
Quote:
And are not the Appendicies with its clear and unmistakable mention of The Silmarallion and events part of LOTR?
What you appear to be asking is whether, somehow, The entire Silmarillion was, by its title being mentioned, incorporated by reference into The Lord of the Rings and hence its film rights?

No.

While I suppose one could try to film the two-paragraph synopsis, it couldn't track the remaining material at all.

Your other question about 'diminishing value' is just a roundabout waty of making a similar but even more audacious claim: that when UA bought the LR fim rights they somehow acquired an ownership interest in everything JRRT might publish in the future. Again, no. UA/Zaentz/New Lin's rights to do something based on the Appendices text is unaffected by the subsequent publication of The Silmarillion.

(But see the South Park episode where Chef is sued by a record company for "prospective plagiarism", for having written a song the company ripped off twenty years later).

If this chutzpatic theory had any merit, then surely New Line could make and distribute The Hobbit on the grounds that it's 'incorporated' in the LR!
__________________
The entire plot of The Lord of the Rings could be said to turn on what Sauron didn’t know, and when he didn’t know it.
William Cloud Hicklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 07:04 PM   #5
Aiwendil
Late Istar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
Aiwendil is a guest at the Prancing Pony.Aiwendil is a guest at the Prancing Pony.
Quote:
What you appear to be asking is whether, somehow, The entire Silmarillion was, by its title being mentioned, incorporated by reference into The Lord of the Rings and hence its film rights?
Maybe I'm missing something - but I didn't think Sauron's argument was this at all. Of course any such claim would be ridiculous. But this, surely is a valid point: the rights owned by Zaentz include any material in the appendices to LotR. Now, the appendices contain (almost) no information on the first age. Appendix A does, however, include a long synopsis of the story of the downfall of Numenor and the establishment of the realms in exile. One could, then, imagine the holders of the film rights attempting to produce an adaptation of this story (though there is, of course, vastly more material on the same subject that is not within their rights).
Aiwendil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 09:01 PM   #6
Nerwen
Wisest of the Noldor
 
Nerwen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ˙˙˙ssɐןƃ ƃuıʞooן ǝɥʇ ɥƃnoɹɥʇ
Posts: 6,694
Nerwen is a guest of Galadriel in Lothlórien.Nerwen is a guest of Galadriel in Lothlórien.Nerwen is a guest of Galadriel in Lothlórien.Nerwen is a guest of Galadriel in Lothlórien.Nerwen is a guest of Galadriel in Lothlórien.
Send a message via Skype™ to Nerwen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aiwendil View Post
Appendix A does, however, include a long synopsis of the story of the downfall of Numenor and the establishment of the realms in exile. One could, then, imagine the holders of the film rights attempting to produce an adaptation of this story (though there is, of course, vastly more material on the same subject that is not within their rights).
But that's the problem– such an adaption would have to be either very sparse or completely inauthentic. All the detail's in the Akallabęth. I mean, the Appendix A version has one line of dialogue and says nothing about Amandil sailing West or Sauron's human sacrifice cult or Isildur rescuing the seedling of the White Tree.

The only way I can see to get round this is for the filmmakers to say they're drawing on Appendix A, then sneak in Akallabęth material to flesh the story out. They'd have to be prepared to go to court over it, though.
Nerwen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 09:44 PM   #7
Sauron the White
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 903
Sauron the White has just left Hobbiton.
Aiwendil is correct in saying that you are misstating my point.

WCH said

Quote:
Your other question about 'diminishing value' is just a roundabout waty of making a similar but even more audacious claim: that when UA bought the LR fim rights they somehow acquired an ownership interest in everything JRRT might publish in the future.
Not at all. You are broadening the issue to the point where it reduces the arguement to absurdity or straw man status. Of course they would not have the rightsto everything JRRT would publish in the future. There is a key question here that is being ignored for one reason or another. What about JRRT and his heirs publishing expanded material which is already owned in film rights form by others? And I refer to the material both in the Appendicies as well as mentions of First or Second Age events in both LOTR and HOBBIT?

That is NOT "everything JRRT might publish in the future" as claimed. It is material already discussed by JRRT and sold as film rights.

Put yourself in the position of the holder of those film rights. You bought the rights, have yet to use them fully, and then see the heirs of the author rewrite the stuff you already own, albeit in far more detailed fashion and much fuller treatment. What would you as rights holder say about this?

Again, I am no attorney but I do think this is not as clear cut as some of you think. I also think such a claim could go a long way in the court system and the outcome would not be a sure thing for the Estate.
Sauron the White is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 01:25 PM   #8
Mithalwen
Pilgrim Soul
 
Mithalwen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: watching the wonga-wonga birds circle...
Posts: 9,461
Mithalwen is lost in the dark paths of Moria.Mithalwen is lost in the dark paths of Moria.Mithalwen is lost in the dark paths of Moria.Mithalwen is lost in the dark paths of Moria.
Wrong but not randomly...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sauron the White View Post
Mithalwen... you said this



I believe your information is not accurate. I have a US first edition of ROTK published in 1955 and it has the appendicies as part of the book. I checked that edition before I posted this thread this morning just to make sure.

To clarify ..having checked it was the index that was missing - the appendices delayed publication but were included.

However it may be worth adding that it seems that there was a great disparity in English and US copyright legislation else the rip off edition would not have been possible.
__________________
“But Finrod walks with Finarfin his father beneath the trees in Eldamar.”

Christopher Tolkien, Requiescat in pace
Mithalwen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:15 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.