Quote:
Originally Posted by Macalaure
Yep, I noticed it. Sorry about that. But why do you say "repeatedly" when it was obviously only once? 
|
Oh, sorry. For some reason I thought you posted twice. Must have mistaken it with
Nogrod or I just need my eyes checked.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac
You're right, but keep in mind that, even though she did not receive a vote until the end, she had been mentioned as a possibility for far longer than 5 minutes.
|
Yes, you are right. However, I am aware of the fact that it might have suited a wolf to raise such a last minute bandwaggon - and imagine what would've happened if for example
Aganzir were a Seer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac
I disagree with keeping Gwath out of the considerations for the wolf among the Aganzir-voters. He's genuine, yes, but he's new, so that says little. In my opinion, he yet simply has not given enough input to be judged. I think you're being hasty there.
|
Well, of course I am not totally leaving him for the whole game. But I said for now, I am giving him the benefit of doubt. If in the future there is something sinister about him, I will of course reconsider even his role in yesterDay's events. But now, you or
Rikae to me look like more probable wolves among
Agan-voters.
Anyway,
Mac, I am keeping you in my orange zone. You seem to be reasonable on one side, on the other, you post things like this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac
Aganzir was innocent. Dammit.
I guess Lommy has been killed because I was her main suspect. She yet did not do any harm to a wolf, so better get rid of her before she eventually starts to. It sadly means that we can deduce little to nothing from her death.
|
I know as innocent, you could be cursing yourself over lynching a bad person as well, but I am getting a bad feeling from your posts in general. And that
Lommy thing - I am not sure if I understand you. Why should she have been killed because you were her main suspect? Anyway, by saying "She yet did not do any harm to a wolf", you also set yourself as an innocent, because if she suspected you, then she did you "harm", and therefore you don't count as wolf. I don't think there was much in her death either, but I am worried if you are not a wolf and as a side-effect it suited you to kill her because she suspected you. Oh, or is that what you meant by that "main suspect" thing? Anyway in that case you could be double-bluffing that, cf. what I said before.
And I must say if I am baffled by anyone, it is
Sally. After her last but one post (that longer one), I really don't know what to think. Not that the theories she brings are not interesting, but I am quite baffled by the way she seems to be so sure of her suspects. Or am I missing a joke once more?