Werewolf XLVI: Getting Back to Basics

[Nogrod]

Back again...

Okay. First there is something rotten in here... (and this only one of the similar oddities I've seen in this game)

Legate says:

You were all "Why do you think Sally was innocent?" and when it was explained by that she leveled Gwath with you, you still said something like "And so what?" What the heck? Did you rethink it? Well nothing against it, but your behavior... oh my...

What I said was:

Legate: have I missed something or why do you think the wolves should have killed Sally?

It was a question whether it was probable that wolves kill Sally - not whether she is innocent. Being the one to get a wolf killed is no reason for wolves to make their kill on. Retaliatory kills aren't the ones wolves would go for but ones that are useful to them.

But what the heck. You seem to have made your minds already.

Is it a village with a host of cobblers, two competing wolf-teams targeting the same person or something...?

[satansaloser2005]

It was a question whether it was probable that wolves kill Sally - not whether she is innocent. Being the one to get a wolf killed is no reason for wolves to make their kill on. Retaliatory kills aren't the ones wolves would go for but ones that are useful to them.

But what the heck. You seem to have made your minds already.

Thanks for clarifying. That makes a lot more sense.


I need to look at more in-depth. Back in a bit.

[Thinlómien]

Originally Posted by Nogrod

Is it a village with a host of cobblers, two competing wolf-teams targeting the same person or something...?

Or is Nogrod playing the "I'm heated, therefore I'm innocent" -game once again?

But yes, please Nogrod share your thoughts. I'd love to hear new suggestions and evidence. Because if this continues this way it's oing to be a boring game and in the worst case I'll have to eat my head. I really don't enjoy being this "sure" about things but I can't help it...


edit: xed with Sally

[Nogrod]

Originally Posted by Thinlómien

Or is Nogrod playing the "I'm heated, therefore I'm innocent" -game once again?

I'm quite relaxed indeed.

Somehow I'm not sure if I'll bother to make any defence to try and show my innocense. First of all it seems to be vain and secondly it looks like an impossible task as the "arguments" given this far are "I don't trust him", "I don't like the way he behaves" and such - like the retaliatory vote of Nerwen fex. What can I do with these?

[Nogrod]

Well. I tried to look backwards anyhow.

But there is no single point made against me! It's all discussion stating whether we lynch Nogrod toDay or ToMorrow. How do you people expect someone to try and show what he is if you just go on saying let's lynch him?

I think I have points enough for voting Nerwen - some made yesterDay some toDay and her vote was really neat and easy for a wolf. But if you wish to let her slip through your hands like you were ready to let Gwath slip yesterDay (I was after him from the first Day on remember - well you don't because it doesn't fit your "lynch Nogrod"-mania) then please do so.

EDIT: X'd with EW