WW LXI: Grimm Tales

[Aganzir]

When examining my behaviour during the later half of yesterday, you might want to keep in mind the fact that I had slept altogether 10-11 hours during the previous two nights. I don't know about you others, but my energy level has more to do with how I post than my role so I should probably start posting on the admin thread every time I've slept less than seven hours.

Originally Posted by Inzil

As yet I do not have past histories of players to rely on and am pretty much learning as I go.

I was talking about their behaviour in this game, not in general. Kath has been far more substantial than, say, Mira.

Originally Posted by Inzil

I thought my reasoning no flimsier than that used by others when people have actually been lynched.

Sometimes people are lynched on flimsy grounds. Truth is, when telling why you suspected Kath, you mostly described what she had been doing and said her un-explained vote sounded bad. Well Kath said she had run out of time, and although she would've wanted to go through his posts, she was happy with her vote. I can't see what was suspicious about that, and your comment looks opportunistic.

Eomer - a hypothetical question. Would your conscience allow you to fake your knowledge about the rules if doing so would make you look better in the eyes of the village?

Originally Posted by Izzy

Why didn't you use that as your reason yesterDay?

Because that day my main reason was that I didn't want Boro or Mith to die. But as you can see from my post #314, I found you suspicious, and mentioned also those things, so I just voted for one of my suspects.

Originally Posted by Izzy

Why would I do such a thing when I thought Boro innocent, and Eomer no idea?

Tell me that. Yet it was you who said we shouldn't think their confusion about the roles pointed to their innocence. Of course their confusion didn't mean they're innocent, no one said so, but you were trying to altogether downplay the whole thing. Like, "hey village keep suspecting them, this doesn't mean anything!"

Originally Posted by Izzy

How is my suspicions of Shasta weird?

Okay sorry - here I admit to being reckless (I decided to go with my gut and not go back to check how things actually were - I had so little time). The thing I found weird about it was how you kept labouring the point of his ordo claim being a bluff, it came across as if you were trying to use every single reason you could find to suspect him.

Phantom why do you think Izzy's claim would have been challenged in eight minutes if she isn't the ranger when half the village is away?

Nerwen and Kath look good.
Inzil and Mira look bad.

**

Okay today.

Originally Posted by Greenie

Well of course I would be calculating!

Yes but the way you were calculating looked evil - you went like "to vote or not to vote" on several people, and waited really long till you voted. Plus your vote was the one that saved Izzy.

Originally Posted by Green

What bothered me more was that she seemed to have decided beforehand that she suspects Fea and was therefore determined to find fur in Fea's every statement.

Exactly my thoughts here.

Originally Posted by Eomer

I'm thinking there is no way Aganzir says this unless Izzy is a wolf. No way. It points out Aganzir as a wolf.

Could you be so friendly as to explain your thought process because I don't get it?

[Nerwen]

Originally Posted by Feanor of the Peredhil

Good grief. Who needs a seer to notice the fact that Aganzir just admitted she's evil.

Fea, I believe you're right. I didn't even notice that!

...You know, that could be right up there with, "I've never been a wolf before..."

Izzy looks pretty bad too, though... she must have known she was misleading us yesterDay.