![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||||
|
Wisest of the Noldor
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Here's an interesting point: consider that if Fea is innocent, she and Lari would have surely looked very like the Lovers to the wolves (unless it's in the rules that the Lovers are opposite sex; I couldn't see that anywhere). However, that would not be an incentive to the wolves to kill Lari, but rather the reverse. You see, in this game the Lover-rules are as follows: Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Even Nerwen wasn't evil in the beginning." –Elmo. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
![]() |
Greenie -> sally (sally - 1)
McCaber -> Nogrod (sally - 1, Nogrod - 1) Roa -> Greenie (sally - 1, Nogrod - 1, Greenie - 1) Nogrod -> Greenie (sally - 1, Nogrod - 1, Greenie - 2) Pitch - > Fea (sally - 1, Nogrod - 1, Greenie - 2, Fea - 1) SpM -> Greenie (sally - 1, Nogrod - 1, Greenie - 3, Fea - 1) Inzil -> Fea (sally - 1, Nogrod - 1, Greenie - 3, Fea - 2) Loslote -> McCaber (sally - 1, Nogrod - 1, Greenie - 3, Fea - 2, McCaber - 1) Fea -> Greenie (sally - 1, Nogrod - 1, Greenie - 4, Fea - 2, McCaber - 1) Lari -> Inzil (sally - 1, Nogrod - 1, Greenie - 4, Fea - 2, McCaber - 1, Inzil - 1) Brinn -> McCaber (sally - 1, Nogrod - 1, Greenie - 4, Fea - 2, McCaber - 2, Inzil - 1) Nerwen - Fea (sally - 1, Nogrod - 1, Greenie - 4, Fea - 3, McCaber - 2, Inzil - 1) Did not vote: sally OK, I have not got much time and I am not going to be around for the rest of the Day until much nearer the deadline, so some quick thoughts. Lari as Nightly victim - She was quite high in many people's suspicion lists, including mine. However, I thought that her annoyance toward the end of yesterDay at being so suspected looked pretty genuine. Quite a few people (again, including me) had made the point that there was likely to be a Wolf among the Hakon voters, and so Lari's death points at sally. But, it may be that this was intended. Or might that be a double bluff? I share the wariness expressed about Fea for her willingness to take on board Lari's Hakon dream theory. But I wonder whether a possible reason for the Wolves picking on Lari may have been to draw attention to this and possible place more pressure on Fea. If Fea is innocent, it would have been clear to the Wolves that she is a potential lynch victim toDay, so it's something that they will have wanted to encourage. As for Greenie, it is fair to point out that, to the Wolves, she would likely have appeared as an innocent. That said, it is also a possibility that they spotted her as a possible Cobbler and avoided voting for her. Of the Greenie voters, Fea does look the worst, but then she did vote to save herself. I can't really comment on my vote and I am not sure that there is much to be drawn for Roa's and Nogrod's votes. Other than that, I still don't like McCaber's vote for Nogrod and I am wary of the way that he has come on now and backed off from it, after all the suspicion that it attracted yesterDay. Given what I have said above, Loslote's vote for McCaber is, I think, understandable. And I am not really able to conclude much from the votes for Fea without knowing what she is. If she is innocent, though, it is quite possible that there was at least one Wolf here, possibly two, taking the opportunity to try to get her lynched.
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
La Belle Dame sans Merci
|
All y'all shouldn't forget the easiest explanation for my bonding with Lari at the end of day: she had a pretty solid point. (Clearly I wasn't bonding with her because we were lovers or packmates.)
I had already floated the theory that Borangutan might have killed Hakon for less than Seer-ly reasons. The longer I play, and the more I look at Hack's posts, the less convinced I am that he dreamed of anybody he listed. However (and here's where it changed): I know my role. And I know Hakon's logic. (Sorry mods) He was playing meta even though it was forbidden. Meta reasoning for who my own personal Stick would make her own personal Crazy Bear for her own personal Amusement? If I was using Hakon's against-the-rules logic, I'd have dreamed of myself first. Hakon's list of people are ones closest to the mod. And I'm the most visible/notorious of those in that category. And while at first I was thinking maybe Borangutan was sensitive to Hakon's hints, that doesn't really matter either way, because evil people are hyper-sensitive to criticism and suspicion. I'm thinking now that Hakon's dreams were supposed to go in the order he listed even though they were preemptively ended. And upon learning that I number amongst the innocents, there was no need for him to throw himself under any buses to ensure my destruction. Hence his vagaries. "Don't think of the bear right away" might have corresponded with my name coming first on the list, but that might be stretching it too far. But it is possible that his insistence that we not look for the bear right away correlated with the fact that I was the name one saw on his list right away, and that you shouldn't look at me when aiming for evil. Then again, he might have just been nattering and it didn't mean anything. There's always that.
__________________
peace
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,039
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Pretty slow toDay, really. No doubt it'll be followed by a frantic hour or two before DL.
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Then, as mentioned, he uses meta-reasoning to say who the bear could be. I edited out the first bit. Quote:
That's all I really see there. I'm sure we'll be enlightened post-game, but for now we're left to work things out on our own. I think any attempt to use that to point to one's innocence is a major reach, and I can only see furry intentions behind it, whether one tries to qualify it or not. Then again, Lari thought there could be something to it, and she obviously was not evil. Regardless, I'm leaning toward another vote for Fea toDay.
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
|
Dear Village,
POST PLEASE. Love, Me.
__________________
Puddle! Puddle! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CT/NY
Posts: 681
![]() |
Dear Village,
I second Nienna. Kthx. Love, me
__________________
Rise and rise again until lambs become lions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Flame of the Ainulindalë
|
I thought I was the only one not around and thought I should post first to say I'm around again but it seems it has been a real quiet Day indeed...
![]() I'll go into reading.
__________________
Upon the hearth the fire is red Beneath the roof there is a bed; But not yet weary are our feet... |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Someday, I'll rule all of it.
Posts: 1,696
![]() |
Ok, I'm here and catching up.
__________________
We can't all be Roas when it comes to analysing... -Lommy I didn't say you're evil, Roa, I said you're exasperating. -Nerwen |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Skyrim, again.
Posts: 820
![]() |
I'm here too, by coincidence.
__________________
Werewolves vs. Fishmen. The battle of the century. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Flame of the Ainulindalë
|
The end of Day2 was odd indeed...
As I read through those final hours last night I was quite convinced they were both wolves: Lari panicking against the suspicions but also offering this odd theory about Hakon's dreams to make Fea innocent and then Fea running to the stage in the end... But Lari was innocent. What Nerwen said about the POV of the wolves actually makes the situation even more confusing. The kill seems to point to Fea and the question remains whether that is bold bluffing (Fea is a wolf) or a set-up by the wolves (Fea is innocent). I would say it'd be a set-up by the wolves, but Fea's insistence on speculating about Hakon's dreams yet toDay makes me kind of worried. Like Inzil said: any attempt to use Hakon's possible dreams to point to one's innocence is a major reach... I mean I was already baffled on the postings of yesterDay as to why people mulled over whether Hakon had revealed someone's innocence as it quite clearly was not the case? Let me quote the famous first post once again - but look at the bolding this time. Quote:
It looks like a very solid tactics from the seer with no major concern on his life on Day1; hinting we should look at other problems, casting the name out in the open but not in a too obvious fashion (like mentioning only Boro). But how does one turn that and the other "infamous statement": Quote:
__________________
Upon the hearth the fire is red Beneath the roof there is a bed; But not yet weary are our feet... |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|