![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Newly Deceased
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
![]() |
I've done a lot of research over the past few days into the general significance of horses in LOTR but am drawing a blank.
In some instances they reflect the character of their rider, they can tell us a lot about a civilization. But is there more? Am I missing something? I have many unanswered questions questions, for instance... Why does Shadowfax allow Gandalf, rather than anyone else, ride him? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,039
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The answer to that must lie in Gandalf's nature as a Maia, sent by the Valar. The Vala Oromë could have been at work there, providing the leader of the fight against Sauron with the one horse that could bear him swifter than any other, and stand up to the terror of the Nazgűl.
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Wight
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 129
![]() |
![]()
Horses were of great importance for most of people living in steppe, whether they were Gots, Mongols or Cossaks. Tolkien is quite accurate in his reconstructions.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Curmudgeonly Wordwraith
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ensconced in curmudgeonly pursuits
Posts: 2,515
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The Rohirrim have horses because the Anglo-Saxons lost to the Normans. Tolkien felt that if King Harold and his Housecarls had had a standing cavalry in 1066, they would not have lost the Battle of Hastings, and England, to the invading William the Bastard and his motley band of Norman barons and continental freebooters. Thus, the Anglo-Saxon monarchy would have retained sovereignity over England, and remained to subjugate, overtax and make lives miserable for the peasantry, rather than have foreigners do the same except much more efficiently.
__________________
And your little sister's immaculate virginity wings away on the bony shoulders of a young horse named George who stole surreptitiously into her geography revision. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Newly Deceased
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Curmudgeonly Wordwraith
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ensconced in curmudgeonly pursuits
Posts: 2,515
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() The revisionist Anglo-Saxon as cavalrymen angle to the Rohirrim has been batted around by Tolkien scholars for years. Or, maybe I just made it up. Yes, I made it up just now. It's fascinating how my mind works. Ummm...what were we talking about again?
__________________
And your little sister's immaculate virginity wings away on the bony shoulders of a young horse named George who stole surreptitiously into her geography revision. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Greece
Posts: 23
![]() |
The Rohirrim, why horses?
There is some archaeological evidence of a 'horse tribe' in England long before the Norman conquest, which I think Tolkien may have been referring to. (Don't ask for references right now as I'm too tired!)
As to the question 'Why horses?' My answer would be, you need to have experience of horses to understand. Even today, contact with horses changes lives. In previous centuries, even up to 100 years ago, possession and knowledge of horses gave you immense power, in the 'dark ages' even more so. Personally I couln't live without horses, they are one of the few things that make life worthwhile, so I guess I would have been a Rider of Rohan in Middle Earth. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 120
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |