WW LXXV: It's Always Tea Time Here

[Shastanis Althreduin]

Originally Posted by Nerwen

The other is that I was thinking last Night that it would actually be better strategy for an Aganwolf to kill Shasta rather than Lottie.

I disagree. That would have made it Lottie, Lommy, Nerwen, and Aganzir at deadline... two of which were/are cleared innocents. I'm not sure that's something the wolf would have wanted to risk at endgame.

Originally Posted by Lommy

What else? Oh, I also had a dream last night where there was huge BD meeting somewhere and somebody (I think Greenie) suggested we finish this game as a RL game by having a few hour picnic. Everybody thought it was a good idea except Agan who said it wouldn't be fair to the wolf because her expressions can reveal her and she sort of slipped she was talking about herself.

Oh, then clearly it's Agan.

Originally Posted by Agan

and that if I was a wolf, my voting record would be much better.

Haven't I already said I disagree with this? If I haven't, then I should have - you can't ask us to take on faith what you "would do if" you were a wolf.

Originally Posted by Nerwen

ZMOG!11! u m3an taht gam3 wEar shaSta r3vealed as teh raNjer & borow00lf got u all 2 linch him??? ROFL!!!!!11111

Translation:

Originally Posted by Nerwen translated

Oh my dear goodness! Do you mean that game where Shasta revealed as the almighty Ranger, and the silly village actually listened to Borowolf and lynched him?! That's so incredibly amusing!

Originally Posted by Nerwen

You do know that's not evidence, right?

I don't think it was supposed to be evidence, Nerwen. Just something amusing to point out.

Originally Posted by Nerwen

Though, perhaps I can help you out. Both incidents you're referring to involved me saying something another player (or players) did might (or might not, in the case of winty) be suspicious. Now I can see where the similarity comes in– those are the only two times anyone has said that about anyone else in the entire history of Werewolf!

–Wait, what?

This made me giggle.

Originally Posted by Nerwen

My dear Agan, if you do turn out innocent I will most certainly blame you for our loss– see my comments to Brinn yesterDay and then multiply them by ten. If you're both innocent, that would mean neither of you even has the excuse of having been manipulated by a wolf!

This bothered me yesterday and it's bothering me again today. Do we have to throw blame around like it's candy?

[Aganzir]

Originally Posted by Nerwen

About as vague as it gets, Agan.

And if I explained my thought process in great detail (not that I'd be able to), then what? "You're overly defensive and making much ado about a small comment!"

Also as vague as it gets. In other words: it reminded you of every werewolf player ever.

Not really, Nerwolf is clearly not the same as every werewolf player ever. If Lommy says something is terrible in her first post, it's okay. If you say it, I keep an eye on you. There are differences between players, and some things that I connect to your wolf self.

And with any luck, by that time half the village will be after the victim. Sound familiar?

Ahh you're talking about my or Nog's playing style?
Seriously, I can believe wolves have done that too, but I think it has more to do with individual players than their roles.

My dear Agan, if you do turn out innocent I will most certainly blame you for our loss– see my comments to Brinn yesterDay and then multiply them by ten. If you're both innocent, that would mean neither of you even has the excuse of having been manipulated by a wolf!

Which is worse, being wrong because of skilful wolf manipulation or being wrong of one's own accord? I don't think there's really a difference. And you can blame me all you want, I hold to my opinion that you look the most suspicious of us.
Anyway using the same logic I could say I'll blame you if you're innocent; why did you have to look so wolfish that Shasta got a free pass through the last days? However if you're innocent and we lose this game, I'd rather not blame anyone... It'd just be damn good playing on Shasta's part rather than bad playing from any of us. At least that's what I'd prefer to think.

Originally Posted by Shastanis Althreduin

Haven't I already said I disagree with this? If I haven't, then I should have - you can't ask us to take on faith what you "would do if" you were a wolf.

Yes you have and I know that anyway. This time I said it just to contrast Nerwen's point about me repeating bad voting is good voting and the other way round.

[Aganzir]

I'm going to busy myself with this soon so just in case...

++Nerwen

[Thinlómien]

Back here, friendses. Will do some rereading...

Out of curiousity: Shasta, which one do you suspect?

[Shastanis Althreduin]

Originally Posted by Thinlómien

Back here, friendses. Will do some rereading...

Out of curiousity: Shasta, which one do you suspect?

They both have points for and against them... for me, it's really a question of "who appears more innocent?". And after yesterday, I think Nerwen appears more innocent than Agan... but I'd hate to vote the "less innocent" rather than the "more wolvish". Ugh.

[Shastanis Althreduin]

Lommy, please say you're here... I know it's late for you but I would really prefer not deciding the outcome of the game by myself!

[Thinlómien]

I am, I'm just stuck on Skype with some 'downers... will you be around for long?