![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,448
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Cool though, you want to vote for me I understand, wouldn't want to mess up this losing streak we're on(sarcasm). I'm going to sleep now. Also after a quick reread Nerwen overcame Nog as my third suspect. Trying to decide if I should vote. Actually yeah not really anything will change my mind on this... ++Sally reasons I stated yesterday haven't changed didn't like How she voted Gil If I was her top suspect the whole time why not vote me? Looks like she just wanted to look like another befuddled ordo.
__________________
Morsul the Resurrected |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Wisest of the Noldor
|
Quote:
posting yesterDay. It's not as if one is committed to picking a single suspect and sticking to him throughout the game.
__________________
"Even Nerwen wasn't evil in the beginning." –Elmo. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Wisest of the Noldor
|
Oh yes, Morsul looks quite bad. He's right about comparing himself to Gil, though. It's the same problem, basically.
__________________
"Even Nerwen wasn't evil in the beginning." –Elmo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,039
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Mellifluous Maia
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: A glade open to the stars, deep in Nan Elmoth
Posts: 3,489
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm not liking this "analyze the two people below you" plan. It was Cop's idea, and it means I'm analyzing Cop; it also means that six people are being analyzed by wizards and that will take up most of the day, giving them a chance to look helpful while doing little. These kinds of analyses are only useful when there is a conclusion, and it's too easy, this way, to analyze without coming to any real conclusion at all (after all, it's just a rote thing, right? Just what you're supposed to do?)
Perhaps we should analyze people we find possibly suspicious? Radical idea, I know. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Mellifluous Maia
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: A glade open to the stars, deep in Nan Elmoth
Posts: 3,489
![]() ![]() ![]() |
That said, I'll go along and analyze Sally and Cop.
I hope people are going to compare the way the same person is analyzed by the two people who are supposed to cover him/her. I really don't like this format, though. It isn't helpful to read a bland summary of every post a person made with no commentary. Couldn't people just mention things that they consider worth commenting on? That, after all, is the sort of thing that makes the analysis reflect on the analyzer as well; it is also much more readable than: #9 - banter #13 - more banter #57 - lots of arguing etc. I mean, really. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
The Werewolf's Companion
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Moon
Posts: 3,021
![]() ![]() ![]() |
But she didn't say you were her 'top suspect all the time'. Just because she suspects you throughout the game doesn't mean she isn't allowed to look at anyone else, or think anyone else is posting suspiciously.
__________________
I have loved the stars too fondly to be fearful of the night. Double Fenris
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|