WWLVIII: Escape From Angband (or Behavioral Modification) - The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum

the phantom · 03-21-2009, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lari

Is that a one time deal or not?

That's what she said.

satansaloser2005 · 03-21-2009, 10:09 PM

Ranger save? Ah, there was a ranger save? Glad someone told me because I didn't see it mentioned in the narration. I guess I'll have to read more carefully next time, yeah?

(In other words, if there was a ranger save I would have said so.)

Isabellkya · 03-21-2009, 10:12 PM

Finding a note about an uncloaked apprentice to phantom? Interesting if not kind of creepy. Nevertheless, it was to the entire group. Doesn't look like it was just to someone(s) in particular.

Maybe it was a ranger save, maybe not. Especially since there was no mention of another person.

I think it an obvious statement - that at least one of the Lommy voters yesterDay was/is a wereDuckie.

X'd with Miss Duckess and Rikae.

Isabellkya · 03-21-2009, 10:15 PM

From the plot, it looked like the Cloaked figure went to the Ducks. Rather than the other way around. If it was a ranger save - regardless of whom was being saved. Wouldn't it of been mentioned?

satansaloser2005 · 03-21-2009, 10:15 PM

Erm, hun, I said there WASN'T a ranger save. It's not that the ranger saved him/herself, it's that the ranger had nothing to do with the Night's events.

Carry on now.

Isabellkya · 03-21-2009, 10:19 PM

My guess at the moment is that the cloaked figure "unlocked" their role in some fashion. Probably by completing a task, or some condition being met.

Meh, who knows - save for Sally and the cloaked figure.

Brinniel · 03-21-2009, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Izzy

My guess at the moment is that the cloaked figure "unlocked" their role in some fashion. Probably by completing a task, or some condition being met.

Perhaps this person was able to unlock their role when the wolves chose to attack them. Though the fact that this mysterious figure was already waiting for them is rather odd.

I'm just wondering what sort of powers phantom's apprentice could have. And are they on our side or their own side? Perhaps we should keep an eye out for anyone who starts to impersonate the phantom toDay.

Gwathagor · 03-21-2009, 10:51 PM

What follows is a collection of all the meaningful remarks about and stances on Thinlomien that I could find. Note: this post contains no original analysis. It is merely a catalog.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rikae

Well, it looks to me as if Fea and Phantom (in spite of his pining for the fjords) have posting requirements; Durelin was ordered to spam us with statistics, Lommy was told to act like Nogrod, Nerwen to revisit her fangirl role, and Mac to act like me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kath

Lommy is the second person to try and make sense – some suspicion of Mira and Nerwen. Thinks Durelin and Izzy seem innocent. And then there was a crosspost –was it Mira she was saying was a Cobbler?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Durelin

Innocent and Trying So Hard:

Lommy
Legate
Kath

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shastanis Althreduin

Thinlómien - Serious side of the fence. Otherwise, no read.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Durelin

I am agreeing a lot with Shasta and Lommy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mithalwen

I won't be voting for Dury, Lommie, or Mac because they are not making referencees to things I don't understand. I have never seen the Princess Bride. or whatever ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lariren Shadow

Guilty:
Shasta
Wilwa
Dury
Izzy
Nerwen
Rikae
Lommy
Kath
Nienna

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brinniel

I don't like either Lommy or Legate's votes. Why vote for someone if you don't think they're the were-duck?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mirandir

Lommie - Seems very very confused and frustrated...but is that because she actually is or because she's been told to act that way. Also voted Lari for banter. Suspicious.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Durelin

Lommy just seems really off. Her vote was an easy one, and her comment about not really thinking Lari is a wolf anyway but "oh, it's just Day 1"...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brinniel

Suspects:

[...]

Lommy: On one hand, she agreed with me when I said we should vote based only on behaviour. Yet she then votes Lari for banter posts. Very contradicting.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nogrod

Good work Lommy for spotting the "dream-thing" from Mira's posting. It looks like something worth trying for the ducks - not the least because even if they failed she would be a nice kill anyway leaving little tracks for anyone to follow. But if that is the truth, then we are sadly out of clues as to solving the problem Mac brought forwards as to whether the ducks feel confident or are under pressure.

Quote:

Originally Posted by wilwarin538

Lommy's "seer hint" spot makes a lot of sense, seers always seem to be the main target for wolves so it wouldn't surprise me for a second that they'd go after anyone who could fill that role.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Durelin

Of course I'm one to talk right now after my vote yesterDay... I do wish I had gone with Lommy or Mac just to stick to some standards, but...wasn't sure when I posted where Brinn was going and if Gwath's vote counted (until he came back and re-posted it).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mithalwen

Lommie is ringing my alarm bells a bit... I don't know if it is just her playing conditions or the fact she is more interested in external things but she really seems different. Somewhat frivolous for someone who normally plays seriously. I don't really like her vote for Lari ... she doesn't seem to give reasons why suspicious but seems to use saying she might vote for her as justification for actually voting for her.

Quote:

Originally Posted by wilwarin538

The list of people I'm pretty sure about:

Lommy
Rikae
Brinn
Nogrod

Quote:

Originally Posted by Macalaure

Unknown:
[...]
Lommy - I can usually figure her out fairly well, but not this time. That could mean she's evil, or that it's just her role/requirement.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Isabellkya

Rikae, Lommy and Mith - there is something funny. Not humor funny. But weird funny.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rikae

Lynch:

Lommy.
[and a few others]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Durelin

This is what's bothering me about Lommy, too. But I'm not sure if she'd try to be less frivolous and careless seeming if she was a wolf. She seems a bit more herself toDay than yesterDay, maybe because she was getting a little bit of attention... Last time I thought because she was easy-going she must be innocent I was dead wrong. But frivolous better describes her right now.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kath

I

Lommy - liking Lommy so far toDay, maybe just 'cause she's arguing back, but I think that's a good sign.

[...]

Possibly innocent:
Lommy
Mac - for all that I said I think he's an impassioned innocent.
Rikae
Durelin

Quote:

Originally Posted by Feanor of the Peredhil

[would trust] Less:

Nienna
Macalaure
Durelin
Lommy
Mith
Rikae

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mithalwen

Trying to deflect attention from yourself Miss Duck? Hardly a major issue since there isn't a lot to look at from him and since I am as sure as duck eggs are duck eggs that you and Nienna are feathered I am more interested in attack than protection.. even of my boy.. If we could dispose of you both today and tonight then we will be well on our way...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mithalwen

OK no more time but with one of my most confident votes ever

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nienna

Lommy – I have no idea.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Durelin

Okay, I have returned in a slightly different mood - here's a more negative list...yesss...

Evilish

[...]

Lommy - Part of me says she does not have her usual direction because she is a wolf trying hard to fabricate some things, part of me says she's not being careful enough to be a wolf. All I know is that ever since that game where she andphantom were wolves I suspect her a lot more. She's certainly not playing like she was then - she was extremely cool and smooth then along with frivolous. Here she seems more flustered and less on top of things. But that may be because she's come under a bit of pressure.

[...]

Creepy

Brinniel - She seems more flippant/frivolous than usual, kinda similar to Lommy.
Gwath - I don't know what it is. I think it's that he actually made a list.

[and others]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gwathagor

I primarily object to Lommy's representation of my motives. She makes it seem as though putting Legate in my less suspicious category and then voting for him anyway was all part of a scheme on my part to get rid of an innocent whom I knew to be a particular threat. What could I, as a duck, have hoped to have gained from drawing attention to myself by voting for someone I had put in my less suspicious category? If it was a plot, then it was a poorly conceived one.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gwathagor

More than anything, it just seems like she is trying to take something small, blow it out of proportion, and get me lynched.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brinniel

Lommy doesn't sit right with me either. It's not really how she says things, but what she says...if that makes any sense. I wonder if we're dealing with an evil Lommy this time...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lariren Shadow

Lommy: Is looking slightly guilty.

[...]

So to sum things up:

Guilty/Feelings of Guilt:
Lommy
Bubbles
Mith
Rikae
Wilwa

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nerwen

YAY!!!!1111!!!!

Another great dilemma!

Gwath...?
Lommy...?
Gwath...?
Lommy...?

Let's see:

Gwath did that strange thing (pointed out by wilwarin) of voting someone he didn't list in the "most suspicious" category. Then, toDay, his manner has been off...quite a lot like a Gwathwolf... but then Lommy is going after him heavily, and she doesn't feel right either.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nogrod

Also her [Durelin's] points on Lommy (as well as those made by Mith) look sensible. It’s probably the first time I’m really uneasy with Lommy due to her posting. There is something overtly careful in her posts and in her avoidance of debate – unless it is defending her case which she does a bit over the top this time.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Durelin

Lommy's behavior I think just seems too uncautious to be wolf behavior. I know she can be completely cool as a wolf, and her oddness (at least as I perceived it) did not start toDay when she has really come under pressure.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nogrod

I'm also worried about Lommy. She seems to be a bit too defensive and vague. She just doesn't feel like honest. The problem being she has been able to pull off a "honest-look" as a baddie as well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nerwen

Okay... there's really not much point voting for anyone except Gwath or Lommy...

++Lommy feels a bit worse, somehow.

Durelin · 03-21-2009, 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Narration

“Phantom's apprentice has uncloaked. You have been warned.”

I'm wondering who is being warned here.

If Sally insists the ranger was not involved, there may be another protector/person with protection abilities (edit: or they gained protection abilities)...but there's no reason to really discuss it unless, as someone suggested, it ever becomes apparent that whoever the wolves went after here is not really on our side either.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Izzy

I think it an obvious statement - that at least one of the Lommy voters yesterDay was/is a wereDuckie.

With that many votes...yeah, I agree.

Hmm...what you up to, Rikae?

Thanks for the quotes, Gwath. As much as I'd like to be as helpful, it's a bit too late for that. Night night.

03-21-2009, 10:09 PM	#2
satansaloser2005 The Sweetest Spoiler Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: from beneath you it giggles incessantly Posts: 5,789	Ranger save? Ah, there was a ranger save? Glad someone told me because I didn't see it mentioned in the narration. I guess I'll have to read more carefully next time, yeah? (In other words, if there was a ranger save I would have said so.) __________________ "My heart always cowers behind the defense of my wit." Friendship is two pals munching on a well-cooked face together. Fenris bookworm.

03-21-2009, 10:12 PM	#3
Isabellkya Ghost Prince of Cardolan Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Amongst trees. Posts: 919	Finding a note about an uncloaked apprentice to phantom? Interesting if not kind of creepy. Nevertheless, it was to the entire group. Doesn't look like it was just to someone(s) in particular. Maybe it was a ranger save, maybe not. Especially since there was no mention of another person. I think it an obvious statement - that at least one of the Lommy voters yesterDay was/is a wereDuckie. X'd with Miss Duckess and Rikae. __________________ But I was clinging to her like a homicidal monkey.

03-21-2009, 10:15 PM	#4
Isabellkya Ghost Prince of Cardolan Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Amongst trees. Posts: 919	From the plot, it looked like the Cloaked figure went to the Ducks. Rather than the other way around. If it was a ranger save - regardless of whom was being saved. Wouldn't it of been mentioned? __________________ But I was clinging to her like a homicidal monkey.

03-21-2009, 10:15 PM	#5
satansaloser2005 The Sweetest Spoiler Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: from beneath you it giggles incessantly Posts: 5,789	For Rikae Erm, hun, I said there WASN'T a ranger save. It's not that the ranger saved him/herself, it's that the ranger had nothing to do with the Night's events. Carry on now. __________________ "My heart always cowers behind the defense of my wit." Friendship is two pals munching on a well-cooked face together. Fenris bookworm.

03-21-2009, 10:19 PM	#6
Isabellkya Ghost Prince of Cardolan Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Amongst trees. Posts: 919	My guess at the moment is that the cloaked figure "unlocked" their role in some fashion. Probably by completing a task, or some condition being met. Meh, who knows - save for Sally and the cloaked figure. __________________ But I was clinging to her like a homicidal monkey.