Tol-in-Gaurhoth Threefold and Six: The Night Guard

[Nilpaurion Felagund]

Here we go again.

Originally Posted by Nienna

Nilp: His voting looks pretty clean. I just wish he would post a little more of his thoughts and suspicions on people

Do my other posts not count? Do I have to wake up at 1 in the bloody morning just to please you with more posts?

[Nerwen]

Originally Posted by Nilpaurion Felagund

Do my other posts not count? Do I have to wake up at 1 in the bloody morning just to please you with more posts?

Yeah, that's another thing, Nienna: our poor Village Fool here has been quite active, and made a case against Inzilawolf yesterDay, so I'm not sure what you mean up there.

All the same, Nilp, there's something I want to know, or rather two somethings: why were you a.) so convinced of Boro's inncence and b.) do you have any other reason for thinking Hakon was Kit's dream apart from the fact that she voted to guard him?

EDIT:X'd with Hakon.

[Nilpaurion Felagund]

Originally Posted by Nerwen

All the same, Nilp, there's something I want to know, or rather two somethings: why were you a.) so convinced of Boro's inncence[ . . . ]

I was not convinced of his complete innocence, but, as I said in that big thing *waves vaguely* he's the only one to make a proper case against Legate. He didn't just say, 'Oh, but Legate, we have to lynch you to explain this headscratcher away', unlike what most of you did.

[ . . . ] and b.) do you have any other reason for thinking Hakon was Kit's dream apart from the fact that she voted to guard him?

Just the Guard vote. It probably has to mean something. True, it might be that I'm looking at the wrong thing, and that Brinn is actually a Werewolf that Kitanna had dreamt of, but I don't think so.

[Nerwen]

Originally Posted by Nilpaurion Felagund

Just the Guard vote. It probably has to mean something. True, it might be that I'm looking at the wrong thing, and that Brinn is actually a Werewolf that Kitanna had dreamt of, but I don't think so.

Okay. I thought you might have something more definite. I don't want to lynch him if he's innocent– and he seems determined to stick his head in the noose.

I mean, his latest contribution may have just set a record for "Number of Distortions, Spurious Arguments and Generally Suspicious Comments in A Single Post".

Originally Posted by Hakon

I feel like there is a giant target on my back today, even though none of you are coming after me.

Well, don't tempt fate, then.

Originally Posted by Hakon

My number one suspect right now is Nerwen. She was the second to vote for Inziladun and the first to vote for Kit and Legate. Almost like she knew Legate was innocent and knew we would go after him. She just chose to get her vote out of the way early. Same thing with Kit. With Inziladun it seems like she was ready to turn on her fellow wolf just to escape suspicion herself. She probably realized that it would be a bandwagon for Inziladun, so she just got her vote out of the way.

You're sure about that, are you, Hakon? The way you were sure Inzil was innocent?

Let me address your points:

1. A first vote early in the Day is not inherently either suspicious or innocent. It's just a vote. Yes, wolves may do this to stay under the radar– but innocents also often have to vote early for RL reasons. Do you actually read my posts, Hakon? I believe this is the fourth time I've explained that the DL in this game is highly inconvenient for me.

Do you know what is suspicious, Hakon? Casting the third vote on an innocent- i.e. starting a wagon. Especially if you then point at the person who cast the original vote and claim, "Wasn't me! She did it!"

Look, if my vote for Legate was "almost like I knew he was innocent", what was yours? (You also cast a first vote on him on Day One– a prima facie case for lupinity, according to you.)

2. At the time I voted Inzil yesterDay, it was, in fact, not at all clear that he was going to be lynched. I voted him because I thought he might well be a wolf. As simple as that.

3. I did not need to "escape suspicion".

Originally Posted by Hakon

I am also suspicious of Sally and Wilwa. Wilwa just because she was involved in all three bandwagons

4. Well, I must admit, that's very unlike you, Hakon– nobody can accuse you of being involved in the bandwagon against the known wolf.

5. As for Sally– I am somewhat suspicious of her myself, as it happens. However, when your attack on her is added to the rest of your accusations, the whole post looks a lot like you're thrashing around trying to find an alternative victim.

Look, if you're innocent, Hakon, the best thing you can do now is explain yourself, not go after other people with weak reasons.

EDIT:spelling.
EDIT2:adding a comment.