![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 344
![]() |
I'm starving hungry, so posting my analysis and deciding on a vote will have to wait until after dinner (can't concentrate any more!). But currently I am tending towards seeing Pitchwife as innocent, leaving Eomer and Shasta as the remaining suspects. Points made by G55 and Pitch about Eomer seem fairly persuasive, so if I had to pick someone ASAP, I would probably pick Eomer. But I still need to consider the case against Shasta carefully. He hasn't said much yet, so I want to see more of what he has to say. He's planning to analyse me, but I would very much like to see what he thinks of the other candidates too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||||||
|
Werewolf Psychic
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: In fire, water, earth, and air. But mostly water.
Posts: 2,832
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#19 - summary of posts thus far. Doesn't think anyone looks very suspicious as of yet. Has been talking a bit with Inzil.
#39 - notes that she'd intended to vote for one of the quieter players/people who haven't shown up. #46 - does the math on what it will mean for the village should Pitch be modfired. #55 - votes for Nessa. Reasons given - won't vote for Pitch as he's likely to be modfired, and this; Quote:
#59 - responds to Nessa. In my paranoia (and my own stubborn refusal to go with the crowd, since basically everyone else thinks she's innocent), this post reads like Wolf A apologizing to Wolf B for voting them. Day 2: #67 - Hm. Quote:
Also: Quote:
![]() Also posts a list. Very suspicious of Inzil, suspicious of Eomer and Sally. On a slight tangent - Quote:
#78 - analyzes Nessa's vote for Pitchwife and the wolf pack's kill of Nerwen. All decent reasoning as far as I can tell, except for the things that were already mentioned earlier in thread. #79 - three paragraphs of defending Inzil for his "wolf-hooking" plan, and then this - Quote:
#119 - As I read this post, I'm slowly realizing that I'm stating a lot of what Kitanna already said, and that you've already answered. ![]() Especially about the Nessa-vote. I see you've answered that. It appears you had a fine reason to vote for Nessa the whole time... so why not just say that from the beginning? Now there's no proof that you didn't think up the entire thing after the fact. ![]() #125 - analyzes Inzil and Kitanna regarding the Seer claims. #127 - after another long theoretical analysis, votes Inzil. This turned out to be the correct vote, but I don't like this - Quote:
#146 - Potential wolves are Eomer, myself, and Pitchwife. This tracks from her previous day's suspicion, when she was confident in G55's innocence. Conclusions to come. My eyes are blurring.
__________________
Shasta– ... However, if he's innocent his famous clairvoyant powers must be taking the week off. Meanwhile, the Night-kills have been awfully effective– almost like we're dealing with a psychic wolf... - Nerwen, WW LXXV |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Werewolf Psychic
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: In fire, water, earth, and air. But mostly water.
Posts: 2,832
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Okay, so, those of you who know me know that I tend to lean on the side of suspicion when I analyze somebody (it's the paranoia, I promise). My analysis of Cop isn't much different - I saw several things that made me suspicious. However, as late in the day as it is, with no one else around, I feel like voting for Cop now would be a throwaway vote - also, knowing how biased I can be, I'd like to give her a chance to at least respond to what I've written. Plus I've got to hit the hay.
Having said that, I feel like I don't have much choice but to go with the self-preservation vote - ++Eomer Good night.
__________________
Shasta– ... However, if he's innocent his famous clairvoyant powers must be taking the week off. Meanwhile, the Night-kills have been awfully effective– almost like we're dealing with a psychic wolf... - Nerwen, WW LXXV |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||||||||
|
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 344
![]() |
Re Shasta's suspicions of me:
Not much I can say to refute what Shasta thinks of as me trying too hard to act innocent. My intended strategy as an innocent in my first game has been to not worry too much about appearing innocent or suspicious, and to be fairly loud and try to say what I'm thinking. In part, hoping that lack of guile and polish will convey itself on its own while I'm concentrating on finding wolves. This may be why I'm coming over as acting too innocent to one or two of you. I could probably have been quieter and sounded less that way, but I believe I would be of less use to the village if I had. Quote:
Quote:
Another reason is that although you clearly think my reason to vote for Nessa prior to her Pitch vote was a perfectly good reason, I thought my reason was terrible. Like I mentioned in post #119, it was not a vote based upon actual suspicion. Putting in a vote that wasn't based on actual suspicion was exactly what I hadn't wanted to do. I was reluctant to do it. I'm a bit puzzled about this: Quote:
You're saying that my initial reason for voting for Nessa (not actually suspecting her, but wanting to create a tie and see what happened) was a "fine reason to vote", but voting for Nessa based on her suspicious vote for Pitch was a bad reason? The only other reading is that you're saying Nessa's behaviour in latching on to suspicion of Sally would be a bad reason to vote for her. Which is exactly what you did when you voted... It looks as if you are placing emphasis on what I said after I mentioned the basis for my vote. I find it a bit suspicious, especially since, had the latter bit been my reason (which it wasn't), it would have been on the same grounds as your vote. On the other hand, Seer-Kitanna seemed to have the same impression of my voting reasons, and of course she was innocent. This is the full version of what I said, with emphasis added. Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|