WW CVI: Tol-in-Westeros Game Thread

[Kitanna]

Originally Posted by Eomer of the Rohirrim

Can't believe they actually got the Seer, though. That Lannister filth always gets lucky somehow.

Is this the error you speak of? Cause only lions are Lannisters?

[Eomer of the Rohirrim]

Originally Posted by Kitanna

Is this the error you speak of? Cause only lions are Lannisters?

My error was in arguing as if the lions had targetted Wilwa, which obviously didn't happen. That kinda rendered my whole post pointless.

By the way, I also noted that 'odd' response to which you refer. Classic tactic?

[Kitanna]

Originally Posted by Eomer of the Rohirrim

My error was in arguing as if the lions had targetted Wilwa, which obviously didn't happen. That kinda rendered my whole post pointless.

Right. Lions = Lannisters. Bear and Maiden fair = not Lannisters. You said Lannister filth, not bear filth. And I obviously lied about going back to work. And I'm not sure why I'm clarifying my answer to your error.

Originally Posted by Eomer

By the way, I also noted that 'odd' response to which you refer. Classic tactic?

I'm not really sure what you're talking about. I've referred to a lot of things.

[Eomer of the Rohirrim]

You've lost me, Kit. Are we no longer even to refer to Lannisters without being accused of being the Bear?

That other point, seeing as you're obviously not in the mood to be cryptic about things, is that I agreed with your assessment of Enca's response to me (you had used the word 'odd' to describe it in your previous post). It was rather chummy behaviour, and I noted it at the time.

[Kitanna]

Originally Posted by Eomer of the Rohirrim

You've lost me, Kit. Are we no longer even to refer to Lannisters without being accused of being the Bear?

No, no. I missed

So if the lions weren't really expecting the Seer to be findable, and chose Wilwa because of this, then I'm sure two of them at least are in this group.

entirely. I read your last line as the Lannisters got lucky in killing Wilwa, not that they got lucky because she died. I just focused on the wrong part of your statement.

That other point, seeing as you're obviously not in the mood to be cryptic about things, is that I agreed with your assessment of Enca's response to me (you had used the word 'odd' to describe it in your previous post). It was rather chummy behaviour, and I noted it at the time.

No cryptic tonight I'm afraid. Too much RL work. But yes, I'm glad you noticed it as well.

[Inziladun]

Originally Posted by Rikae

Wait, unless you mean the "seerishness" scenario? It's not that risky since her case against Mac doesn't really stand out in any way, which is precisely why I don't think she would have looked seerish in the first place.

No, I meant the "G55 as a Hunter" scenario.

Originally Posted by Rikae

I am wary of Mac right now, but it's pretty much only of him being a bear or a maiden fair. For lions, I think we need to look elsewhere. Like Eomer. Or Encai the Kingslayer. Or Kitanna.

Sorry, I don't follow the Kingslayer reference. I really ought to read these books.

Originally Posted by Kitanna

Is this the error you speak of? Cause only lions are Lannisters?

Maybe he means the fact the he said Wilwa was slain by Lions.

x/d with Eomer x 2 and Mac